GMAT Prep Prac 1 - Q19

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times

by HeintzC2 » Tue Aug 09, 2011 6:20 am
The bolded logic below makes no mathematical sense. you cannot perform this function.
This would be equivalent to saying x*y = 0
therefore x = 0 and y = 0.
while it is possible for both to equal 0, only x OR y must equal 0.

This question is just a simple case of number of equations, number of unknowns. each option gives you 1 distinct equation, with 2 unknowns in it. Since no new variables are introduced in either equation, it would be possible to solve the equations simultaneously.

Answer is C
gmat740 wrote:OA is D


I. (3r + 2 - s)(4r + 9 - s) = 0
so
(3r + 2 - s) = 0
(4r + 9 - s) = 0


solve both these eqn's
s= -19
r = -7

now our equation is

y = 3x +2

so for a point to lie on the lie, it must satisfy the equation of line

s = 3r + 2

Put the values of r and s

-19 = 3(-7)+2
-19= -19

Hence (r,s) lie on the line.


II. (4r - 6 - s)(3r + 2 - s) = 0

(4r - 6 - s) = 0

(3r + 2 - s) = 0

proceed just like the steps above and you will get two different values of r and s

put those values of r and s back into the eqn of the line and check whether they satisfy or not


So both statements are suff

So answer D


Hope this Helps

Karan