BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Cutting back!

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pmFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 127 times
by gmat_perfect » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:18 am
To help counteract the adverse effects of trout stocking on the amphibian populations in certain mountain lakes, biologists are recommending cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed from some popular fishing lakes.

(A) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed
(B) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even that they remove them
(C) that trout stocking be cut back in some states and they even remove the trout
(D) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even their being removed
(E) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even remove the trout

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]

Recommending that X be Y--fine.

What are the other errors in other options?

Please explain.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:47 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:680

by beatthegmatinsept » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:23 am
To help counteract the adverse effects of trout stocking on the amphibian populations in certain mountain lakes, biologists are recommending cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed from some popular fishing lakes.

(A) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed - 'their' is ambiguous and recommending should be followed with 'that'.
(B) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even that they remove them recommeding 'that' and the sentence just seems awkard with 'on the part of some states..'
(C) that trout stocking be cut back in some states and they even remove the trout I think there is parallelism error
(D) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even their being removed 'their' is akward.
(E) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even remove the trout correct use of 'recommending that' and no awkard construction

Hope this helps.
Being defeated is often only a temporary condition. Giving up is what makes it permanent.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:49 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:7**

by CosmicEnergy » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:38 am
gmat_perfect wrote:To help counteract the adverse effects of trout stocking on the amphibian populations in certain mountain lakes, biologists are recommending cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed from some popular fishing lakes.

(A) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even their being removed
(B) cutting back on trout stocking on the part of some states and even that they remove them
(C) that trout stocking be cut back in some states and they even remove the trout
(D) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even their being removed
(E) that some states cut back on trout stocking and even remove the trout

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]

Recommending that X be Y--fine.

What are the other errors in other options?

Please explain.
Yes grammatically Recommending that X be Y is correct.

A/B: recommending cutting is plain wrong; we should avoid the concatenated ING's

C: it suffers from 2 problems:
1) [Meaning] it is states which can cut back on trout stocking; trout stocking can't cut by itself.
2) [Grammar] Parallelism is violated: you must have "that" after "and" here if the sentence after "and" has a proper subject and verb (Subject being "they" in this case)

for example: College recommended that X and that Y

D: Parallelism problem: X and Y-- X and Y are not parallel


CosmicEnergy
GMAT Tutor
Bangalore
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 4:25 am
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:620

by madhukumar_v » Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:23 am
1. Recommending that, leaves C,D,E
2. "they" in C can refer to states or biologists (Ambiguity)- Wrong
3. D - obvious being and their reference to either states or biologists.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 21 times

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:03 pm
Couls someone explain why C is wrong ?

I do not think They is ambiguous here .
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pmFollowed by: 255 members
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:38 pm
Regarding C, there are a few problems:

1) The verb tense of "remove" is incorrect, because you have:

biologists are recommending x and they even remove y

Because the two actions are taken as similar/equivalent, they should be in the same form (e.g. "biologists are recommending x and even removing some trout...")

"Are recommending" is present-tense...it's going on now. "They even remove" is an indicative-tense, "that's just what happens" verb, so logically it doesn't make sense, either. The purpose of the sentence is to talk about current events happening in trout stocking.

2) "in some states" is an ambiguous modifier. I don't think that "they" is really an unclear pronoun - the only subject that it can replace is "biologists". But the modifier "in some states" could take the form of:

-biologists are making the recommendation in some states

OR

-trout stocking should be cut back in some states

By turning that from a modifier into a subject in D and E ("some states should cut back...") the remaining answers fix that problem.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1