BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

mgmat absolute values

Expert replies
by resilient » Wed May 21, 2008 11:30 am
Is x > 0?

(1) |x + 3| = 4x – 3

(2) |x – 3| = |2x – 3|


qa is a

st. 1 gives pos and neg
st.2 gives 0 and 0 so i chose b
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by senthil » Wed May 21, 2008 8:45 pm
I feel it can't be answered by both the options ! the option should be E !


Thanks
Senthil
Join the discussion

by netigen » Wed May 21, 2008 9:42 pm
I am getting x=0 or x=2 from both the equations should be E
Join the discussion

by simplyjat » Wed May 21, 2008 11:31 pm
If I remember correctly this is a question from MGMAT, and they have a really good explanation for the solution. What did you not understand from the MGMAT explanation?
simplyjat
Join the discussion

by mandy12 » Thu May 22, 2008 12:22 am
Well a very tricky question ..but indeed the answer is A.

Here is how - I learnt from some website that the best way to solve the mod problems is to remove the mod ...i.e. square the equation

so from both 1 and 2 we get the roots as 0 and 2. But if we put these values back in the given equations we see that both 0 and 2 satisfy equation 2 but only 2 satisfies equation 1... hence A is the answer
Join the discussion

mgmat inequalties!

by resilient » Sat May 24, 2008 10:14 pm
Simplyjat,

As you see, I am trying to see where I went wrong my esteemed and dear friend. Your memory serves you correctly and yes this is an mgmat question. The explanation is good but I do want to learn more about absolute values. I tend to get these wrong. This is why! ALso, I am aiming at enriching the conversation on absolute values here. If you don't like the topic, simply don't participate for you are here only on your own choice and voluntary basis.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by netigen » Sat May 24, 2008 10:53 pm
Good point mandy,

Need to be careful with abs questions. I remember now that we need to always substitute back and confirm the roots work.
Join the discussion

abs

by resilient » Sun May 25, 2008 7:21 am
YES,

For abs I know that you must account for pos and neg situations but I was never checking the alues into the equation to confirm. THis was why I got it wrong. I learned something very important today!
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by kiskopata » Thu May 29, 2008 9:20 am
go through this and you will discover the ancient lost art of solving absolute value equations.....
https://www.manhattangmat.com/strategy-s ... -value.cfm

:lol:
Try not. Do or do not. There is no try
_______________________________
https://d4dial.blocked
Join the discussion

by netigen » Thu May 29, 2008 10:04 am
There is another way to solve A

|x + 3| = 4x – 3
x = (|x + 3| + 3) / 4

which will always be +ve
Join the discussion

absolutes

by resilient » Thu May 29, 2008 11:06 am
nice approach i like that. makes sense too
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by zacharyz » Thu May 29, 2008 12:56 pm
Mandy12 - when do you find it appropriate (and easiest) to find the answer by squaring the equation. I had not thought about this approach before but am intrigued for it applications.
Join the discussion