B is pretty obvious , SUFFICIENT.
well as for A, " Triangle CED is isosceles with base CD"
assuming that it is saying CE=ED (thats what i make out of this sentence) then because of similarity of oppsite triangles in a circle should also be SUFFFICIENT,
so my take would be D.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
parallel?
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
The problem is asking "Are the lines FG and AB parallel to CD?"
If it was only AB, then each of the statements alone is sufficient.
But as it is 'FG and AB', none of the statements provide any information that can allow us to relate FG with AB and CD. Hence we cannot specify any single line FG as there are infinite possible lines that would pass through E.
Hence, together the statements are not sufficient to answer the problem.
The correct answer is E.
If it was only AB, then each of the statements alone is sufficient.
But as it is 'FG and AB', none of the statements provide any information that can allow us to relate FG with AB and CD. Hence we cannot specify any single line FG as there are infinite possible lines that would pass through E.
Hence, together the statements are not sufficient to answer the problem.
The correct answer is E.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
realize my folly!! thanks rahul.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
∠BAD = ∠ADCRamit88 wrote:plz explain how AB ll to CD ?
Thanks
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
https://library.thinkquest.org/20991/geo/parallel.htmlankur.agrawal wrote:What is the rule for two lines to be PArallel. Can sumbody plz explain?
Thanks
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
See the below picture that shows the properties of line to be parallel.
When you know:
1. Angle AFG = Angle FGD,
2. Angle CGF = Angle BFG,
3. Angle EFB = Angle EGD,
4. Angle EFA = Angle EGC,
5. Angle AFG = Angle CGH,
6. Angle BFG = Angle DGH,
7. Angle AFG + Angle EGC = 180,
8. Angle BFG + Angle FGD = 180,
Any of the above is given to you then you are definitely dealing with a pair of parallel lines. And you can also derive couple of more formulas to know the parallelism
When you know:
1. Angle AFG = Angle FGD,
2. Angle CGF = Angle BFG,
3. Angle EFB = Angle EGD,
4. Angle EFA = Angle EGC,
5. Angle AFG = Angle CGH,
6. Angle BFG = Angle DGH,
7. Angle AFG + Angle EGC = 180,
8. Angle BFG + Angle FGD = 180,
Any of the above is given to you then you are definitely dealing with a pair of parallel lines. And you can also derive couple of more formulas to know the parallelism
- Attachments
-
Last edited by shovan85 on Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
∠AEB =∠CEDRamit88 wrote:how statement 1 is suff to say that AB ll CD
∠ECD =∠EDC
AE*ED = BE*CE (theorem of intersecting secants) : [url] https://www.mathopenref.com/chordsintersecting.html
Since, CE = DE => AE = BE
So, ∠EAB =∠EBA = ∠ECD =∠EDC
Hence, AB ll CD
Thanks
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Thanks buddy. Dat was a good link.anshumishra wrote:https://library.thinkquest.org/20991/geo/parallel.htmlankur.agrawal wrote:What is the rule for two lines to be PArallel. Can sumbody plz explain?
Some doubts.Apology if these are too silly.anshumishra wrote:∠AEB =∠CED Why?Ramit88 wrote:how statement 1 is suff to say that AB ll CD
∠ECD =∠EDC (we know it is an insocles triangle with base CD but does that means EC=ED. It can be CE=CD or even CD=ED.
AE*ED = BE*CE (theorem of intersecting secants) : [url] https://www.mathopenref.com/chordsintersecting.html
Since, CE = DE => AE = BE ( if we even assume ∠ECD =∠EDC i.e. CE=DE then AE=BE i.e ∠ECD =∠EDC but dat does not mean that all the four below are equal)
So, ∠EAB =∠EBA = ∠ECD =∠EDC
Hence, AB ll CD
No need to apology, sometimes I may miss something as well (hopefully not in this case). Keep the doubts comingankur.agrawal wrote:Some doubts.Apology if these are too silly.anshumishra wrote:∠AEB =∠CED Why?Ramit88 wrote:how statement 1 is suff to say that AB ll CD
∠ECD =∠EDC (we know it is an insocles triangle with base CD but does that means EC=ED. It can be CE=CD or even CD=ED.
AE*ED = BE*CE (theorem of intersecting secants) : [url] https://www.mathopenref.com/chordsintersecting.html
Since, CE = DE => AE = BE ( if we even assume ∠ECD =∠EDC i.e. CE=DE then AE=BE i.e ∠ECD =∠EDC but dat does not mean that all the four below are equal)
So, ∠EAB =∠EBA = ∠ECD =∠EDC
Hence, AB ll CD
As derived above : CE = DE => AE = BE
Look at the triangles AEB and CED
∠AEB = ∠CED = z
∠ECD = ∠EDC = x
∠EAB = ∠EBA = y
So, x+x+ z = 180 = y + y+ z
=> 2x = 2y => x=y
So, ∠EAB =∠EBA = ∠ECD =∠EDC
Hope that clears your doubt.
Thanks
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Anshu
(Every mistake is a lesson learned )


















