(1) xyz = 1
x,y,z are all positive or two of them are negative
xy=1/z
z is unknown
so xy is also unknown
insufficient
(2) xz > 1
x and z are either both negative or both positive
insufficient
TOGETHER
y is positive
y=1/xz<1
0<y<1
but z is still unknown so x is unkonwn
insufficient
so choose E
DS - 1
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
fruti_yum
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:46 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
JJJooe wrote:(1) xyz = 1
x,y,z are all positive or two of them are negative
xy=1/z
z is unknown
so xy is also unknown
insufficient
(2) xz > 1
x and z are either both negative or both positive
insufficient
TOGETHER
y is positive
y=1/xz<1
0<y<1
but z is still unknown so x is unkonwn
insufficient
so choose E
IMO C
I'm sure you will agree that both statements taken indiviually are insufficient
together
we have xyz = 1
xz > 1
let xz = 2
x = 1 or 2
for xyz to equal 1
if x = 2, y = 1 and z = 1/2
or x =2, y = 1/2 and z = 1
in both cases xy is less than 1
Sufficient
-
crackgmat007
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
Together
we have xyz = 1
xz > 1
let
A. x = 2, y = 1/2, z = 1
B. x = 10, y = 1/2, z = 1/5
Solving we get, xy < 1 for A and xy > 1 for B. Hence E.
Can someone solve the above algebriacally?
we have xyz = 1
xz > 1
let
A. x = 2, y = 1/2, z = 1
B. x = 10, y = 1/2, z = 1/5
Solving we get, xy < 1 for A and xy > 1 for B. Hence E.
Can someone solve the above algebriacally?
We all know that the answer is either C or E.Xbond wrote:Hi there,
Could you explain in the simplest this concept and how to resolve it
Is xy > 1 ?
(1) xyz = 1
(2) xz > 1
First we combine condition 1 and 2.
we know that xz is greater than 1 therefore, in order for condition 1 to hold y must be equal to 1/xz.
Then xy is equal to 1/z. Now we need to see whether 1/z is greater than 1. From condition 2 we know that z can take any value, thus 1/z can be both greater than 1 and less than 1.
Therefore, IMO E.

















