BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan Quant

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 17 times

by gmat25 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:52 am
chaitanya.mehrotra wrote:If r + s > 2t, is r > t ?

(1) t > s

(2) r > s

OA after some discussion
IMO A

given:

r + s > 2t => r - t > t - s --- (1)

from A we get, t -s > 0

putting this result in eqn 1 we get r - t > 0 => r > t SUFFICIENT

Op B

r > s =>

r + s > 2r or r + s < 2r ---> putting these two results in the below given eqn u get two different results and hence INSUFFICIENT

Given: r + s > 2t
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 85 times

by clock60 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:21 pm
hi all, i want to believe that the answer is D
(1)r+s>2t, and t>s, if we sum both we get
r+s+t>2t+s. canceling s, left us with r+t>2t. and finally r>t suff
(2)the same way
r+s>2t, and r>s, again sum, 2r+s>2t+s, cancel s and left with 2r>2t, r>t also suff
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 25 times

by Ozlemg » Mon Jul 25, 2011 12:58 am
IMO D
I plugged in these numbers. All satisfied the rule!

1.t>s -->0>-1, -2>-8, 1/2>1/4, 5>10
2.r>s ->0>-1, -2>-8, 1/2>1/4, 5>10
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3835
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pmFollowed by: 523 members
Location: Milpitas, CA
Thanked: 1854 times
GMAT Score:770

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:16 am
chaitanya.mehrotra wrote:If r + s > 2t, is r > t ?

(1) t > s
(2) r > s
Statement 1: t > s ---> (t + t) > (s + t) ---> 2t > (s + t)
Hence, (r + s) > 2t > (s + t) ---> r > t

Sufficient

Statement 2: r > s ---> (r + r) > (r + s) ---> 2r > (r + s)
Hence, 2r > (r + s) > 2t ---> r > t

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:52 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by ArpanaAmishi » Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:29 pm
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
chaitanya.mehrotra wrote:If r + s > 2t, is r > t ?

(1) t > s
(2) r > s
Statement 1: t > s ---> (t + t) > (s + t) ---> 2t > (s + t)
Hence, (r + s) > 2t > (s + t) ---> r > t

Sufficient

Statement 2: r > s ---> (r + r) > (r + s) ---> 2r > (r + s)
Hence, 2r > (r + s) > 2t ---> r > t

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.
How come we reach r > t from (r + s) > 2t > (s + t) and same for 2r > (r + s) > 2t ---> r > t

Please help me in understanding this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1