-
sumitkhurana
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- GMAT Score:710
Fines levied against those responsible for
certain environmentally damaging accidents
are now so high that it costs a company
responsible for such an accident more to pay
the fine than it would have cost to adopt
measures that would have prevented the
accident. Therefore, since businesses value
their profits, those that might have such
accidents will now install adequate
environmental safeguards.
Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?
�� Businesses generally greatly
underestimate the risk of future
accidents.
�� Businesses are as concerned with longterm
as they are with short-term
strategies for maximizing profits.
�� Businesses generally do the
environmentally “right” thing only if
doing so makes good business sense.
�� Businesses treat fines that are levied
against them as ordinary business
expenses.
�� Businesses are learning to exploit the
public’s environmental awareness in
promoting themselves.
certain environmentally damaging accidents
are now so high that it costs a company
responsible for such an accident more to pay
the fine than it would have cost to adopt
measures that would have prevented the
accident. Therefore, since businesses value
their profits, those that might have such
accidents will now install adequate
environmental safeguards.
Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?
�� Businesses generally greatly
underestimate the risk of future
accidents.
�� Businesses are as concerned with longterm
as they are with short-term
strategies for maximizing profits.
�� Businesses generally do the
environmentally “right” thing only if
doing so makes good business sense.
�� Businesses treat fines that are levied
against them as ordinary business
expenses.
�� Businesses are learning to exploit the
public’s environmental awareness in
promoting themselves.












