GMAT Prep 2 DS

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: GMAT Prep 2 DS

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:52 pm
thechamp wrote:If zt < -3, Is z < 4?

1. z < 9

insuf

2. t < -4

t=-5 z=5

zt= -25 < -3

t=-5 z =2

zt=-10 < -3

INSUF

together still insuf E

But I really don't know how to solve this question easily with ineqs ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:42 pm

by thechamp » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:02 pm
You are correct.

This is how I tried to solve it

For 2) t<-4

zt<-3
z < -3/t

Take any value of t<-4, z will always be < 4
e.g., If t=-8, z<-3/-8 i.e. 3/8 (< 4)
For t = -15, z<-3/-15 i.e z<1/5 (<4)

What am I missing?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:06 pm
For 2) t<-4

zt<-3
z < -3/t

Take any value of t<-4, z will always be < 4
e.g., If t=-8, z<-3/-8 i.e. 3/8 (< 4)
For t = -15, z<-3/-15 i.e z<1/5 (<4)

What am I missing?
Without knowing the sign of t it is not ok to rewrite inequality as

z<-3/t

If t was negative then the INEQUALITY reverses. This is the gotcha when dealing with inequalities.

Hope this helps!

Regards,
CR

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:28 pm
cramya, what is your approach for this question ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:34 pm
Picking numbers like u did seems to be a good option for this problem IMO

Algebrically it can get a bit tedious and nothing comes to my mind.



Regards,
CR