BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

gmat CR...explanations please

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:53 pm
kevincanspain wrote:
r2kins wrote:A reason Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. On the other
hand, a reason Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires. So, the task must be assigned to Parker, the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Larson has the assertiveness the task requires.
(B) The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
(C) Franks would be assigned the task if Franks had the assertiveness the task requires.
(D) The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind of scheduling conflict.
(E) No one who is not a supervisor in the shipping department has the assertiveness this task requires.
D is NOT assumed, as what is assumed is that the task cannot be assigned to anyone who has an UNAVOIDABLE scheduling conflict. If Larson had an avoidable conflict, this conflict might not prevent her from being assigned the task.
Does this mean 'D' is not the correct answer?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:01 pm
so , the way it works is -
we know a person having scheduling conflict cannot be assigned (from larson)
a person lacking assertiveness cannot be assigned (Franks)

conclusion - peter gets assigned

Personally , I did not like any of the assumptions because they were really not assumptions supporting the argument
I always ask myself for all assumption questions - " Does the argument depend on this being true"

A good assumption would have been that there are only 3 people in the department Or something like 'any person in the department not having a scheduling conflict and having assertiveness can only be assigned and Parker is the only such person"[/b]
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:12 am
kevincanspain wrote:
r2kins wrote:A reason Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. On the other
hand, a reason Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires. So, the task must be assigned to Parker, the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Larson has the assertiveness the task requires.
(B) The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
(C) Franks would be assigned the task if Franks had the assertiveness the task requires.
(D) The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind of scheduling conflict.
(E) No one who is not a supervisor in the shipping department has the assertiveness this task requires.
D is NOT assumed, as what is assumed is that the task cannot be assigned to anyone who has an UNAVOIDABLE scheduling conflict. If Larson had an avoidable conflict, this conflict might not prevent her from being assigned the task.

In other words, we're required to differentiate between avoidable schedule conflicts and unavoidable schedule conflicts? Couldn't we say that an avoidable schedule conflict is as good as NO scheduling conflict, since it's avoidable?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by adi_800 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:16 am
We have defender assumption here...
A new element is introduced in the last statement of the passage. So, this element should be connected to the premises of the passage, which are at the start of the passage so that the gap can be filled.
I think any option that links to only one premise would be wrong.
Instead, B deals with the other part of the conclusion. A Supervisor.

So, I think B would be fine.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:3 members

by FightWithGMAT » Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:52 am
r2kins wrote:A reason Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. On the other
hand, a reason Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires. So, the task must be assigned to Parker, the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Larson has the assertiveness the task requires.
(B) The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
(C) Franks would be assigned the task if Franks had the assertiveness the task requires.
(D) The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind of scheduling conflict.
(E) No one who is not a supervisor in the shipping department has the assertiveness this task requires.
BD BD DB DB ??????I was oscillating :(

I chose B.
But after reading all the good points made in this thread and seeing the OA, I analyzed all the options again.

If we phrase B as:

Other than a supervisor in the shipping department, the task cannot be assigned to anyone who does not have unavoidable conflict or who does have assertiveness of the task.

Then only it makes good sense.

Now D,

As Kavin mentioned

D says that The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind (unavoidable) scheduling conflict.
So, D makes sense here.
Last edited by FightWithGMAT on Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:26 am
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

by Maciek » Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:59 am
I choose B.

A is irrelevant
B is correct. it makes the argument valid.
C is invalid.
D is too broad.
E is weaker assumption than B

Premise 1: Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict.
Premis 2: Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires
Premise 3: Parker is the only supervisor in the shipping department other than Larson and Franks.
Answer B: The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
Conclusion: the task must be assigned to Parker
"There is no greater wealth in a nation than that of being made up of learned citizens." Pope John Paul II

if you have any questions, send me a private message!

should you find this post useful, please click on "thanks" button :)
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:02 pm
B looks good to me.

I need some advice on why C is not close? I did not see anyone mentioning about C much.

Only reason I see why C is not close is because it doesnt affect the conclusion.

Am I missing something?
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:59 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
r2kins wrote:A reason Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. On the other
hand, a reason Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires. So, the task must be assigned to Parker, the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Larson has the assertiveness the task requires.
(B) The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
(C) Franks would be assigned the task if Franks had the assertiveness the task requires.
(D) The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind of scheduling conflict.
(E) No one who is not a supervisor in the shipping department has the assertiveness this task requires.
BD BD DB DB ??????I was oscillating :(

I chose B.
But after reading all the good points made in this thread and seeing the OA, I analyzed all the options again.

If we phrase B as:

Other than a supervisor in the shipping department, the task cannot be assigned to anyone who does not have unavoidable conflict or who does have assertiveness of the task.

Then only it makes good sense.

Now D,

As Kavin mentioned

D says that The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind (unavoidable) scheduling conflict.
So, D makes sense here.

this argument is weird... a really weird... and tough
i cant think and explain and understand why D is the answer, for me, B should be the answer. so weird if the OA is D
suppose that there are 3 people on the ship and one has unavoidable schedule conflict and other has no assertiveness the task requires and the left one might be chosen
thus the condition to be chosen is (s)he has avoidable schedule and the assertiveness the task require, correct?
agree that D says the task cant be given to anyone who has scheduling conflict but what about assertiveness? what if (s)he has no assertive? she still not has enough condition to get the task, right?
thats why i chose B. how come its D the answer?
we should ask for more explaination from the experts....hmhmhm weird!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:16 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by vaivish » Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:50 am
Can we have responses from any Experts on this?
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:53 am
I'm still confused... why D should be the right answer? :shock: Experts, please explain..
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:38 pm
bakhshaliyev wrote:I'm still confused... why D should be the right answer? :shock: Experts, please explain..
Hi,

the source is bad - (B) is definitely the correct choice, as explained in the many posts above!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:40 am
thanks a lot Stuart!
Top
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:44 am
Location: Chennai
GMAT Score:620

by nitin9003 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:33 am
D is still unclear can any expert explain the answer briefly.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:33 am
kevincanspain wrote:
r2kins wrote:A reason Larson cannot do the assignment is that she has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. On the other
hand, a reason Franks cannot do the assignment is that he does not quite have the assertiveness the task
requires. So, the task must be assigned to Parker, the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.

The argument depends on assuming which one of the following?
(A) Larson has the assertiveness the task requires.
(B) The task cannot be assigned to anyone other than a supervisor in the shipping department.
(C) Franks would be assigned the task if Franks had the assertiveness the task requires.
(D) The task cannot be assigned to anyone who has any kind of scheduling conflict.
(E) No one who is not a supervisor in the shipping department has the assertiveness this task requires.
D is NOT assumed, as what is assumed is that the task cannot be assigned to anyone who has an UNAVOIDABLE scheduling conflict. If Larson had an avoidable conflict, this conflict might not prevent her from being assigned the task.
You mean to say D cannot be the OA .
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:36 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
bakhshaliyev wrote:I'm still confused... why D should be the right answer? :shock: Experts, please explain..
Hi,

the source is bad - (B) is definitely the correct choice, as explained in the many posts above!
But isnt
the only supervisor in the shipping department other than
Larson and Franks.
just additional information about Parker . The stimulus doesnt say that Parker is being the task because he is the only supervisor left after Larson and Franks.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Post new topic Post Reply