BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT CR Assumption

Expert replies

by nh8404052006 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:09 pm
Personally, I will go for D. The reason is that if the number of worker was more or less the same, but the number of hours that a worker work (per day) was reduced by half, then the number of production or the production per worker would be reduced, even with more or less the same number of workers. And this it gave us a false impression that there was less production waste.
IMO : D
Correct me if I am wrong.
Join the discussion

by S0laris » Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:46 pm
I chose E basing on same thoughts, and isn't B is out bc it tries to shift the scope from production workers to the passenger jets ? I POEd it for this reason also.
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

Re: GMAT CR Assumption

by piyush_nitt » Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:05 pm
abhi75 wrote:In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division’s hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was
40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer’s program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.
B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.
C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.
D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.
E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

Looking at the question I thought it was an easy one to crack. Since the argument is about number of pounds/production worker, the argument has to assume something about the total number of production workers in 1994 should not be significantly less than in the previous year.

Say in 1994 - the number of workers is 10
Total hazardous waste = 1000 pounds then the number of pounds/worker is 100 pounds.

Last year the amount of waste = 1000 pounds and the number of workers are increased to 50 then the number of pounds/worker of the waste is 20 pounds.

So with this thought process I applied the Kaplan denial test and concluded that it weakens the argument. Thats why I choose E.

Obviously the answer was not E but B.

Stuart can you please explain how to differentiate between 2 choices that are very close (atleast in this case for me).

I would appreciate others input too.

Thanks.
Abhi
Guys,

I know it is silly question but can anyone please let me know what exactly the option E means?

E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year

Doesnot it mean that number of workers are more or less same as it was in 1994?
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:42 pm
for future ref. this is a GPREP question with OA E
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:12 am
uptowngirl92 wrote:for future ref. this is a GPREP question with OA E
*puts down his herring*

Where were you 18 months ago!

B-)
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by mahendra700 » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:27 pm
I too end up with E. :roll: Hope this is correct
Join the discussion