PS

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:04 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

PS

by f2001290 » Mon May 28, 2007 4:40 am
The points P, Q, R lie on a line in that order with PQ=9, QR=21. Let O be a point not on PR such that PO=RO and the distances PO and QO are integral.
Then sum of all possible perimeters of triangle PRO is

(a) 320 (b) 350 (c) 380 (d) 410

Whats is meant by "integral" ?? Is this with-in the scope of GMAT

I don't know the source of this question
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

by sanju09 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:12 am
f2001290 wrote:The points P, Q, R lie on a line in that order with PQ=9, QR=21. Let O be a point not on PR such that PO=RO and the distances PO and QO are integral.
Then sum of all possible perimeters of triangle PRO is

(a) 320 (b) 350 (c) 380 (d) 410

Whats is meant by "integral" ?? Is this with-in the scope of GMAT

I don't know the source of this question
Source is definitely not legitimate as there are only four answer choices. The term 'integral' here means that the distances PO and QO are (positive) integers; and use of this term is well within the scope of GMAT.

A point equidistant from two fixed points lies on the right bisector of the line joining the two fixed points. Hence triangle PRO is isosceles or equilateral, in which 2 PO > 30, or PO > 15, hence the minimum PO = 16. The question is too ambiguous at first sight, may be it has got something very special to do with the information that QO is integer, but still, the point O can be too far away from the line segment PR, to call the sum of all possible perimeters of triangle PRO finite. I am giving up for the moment.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com