BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Mean of the Means

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:14 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:5 members

Mean of the Means

by MBA.Aspirant » Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:48 pm
When do you take the average of the averages given, and when do you do their sum then divide by the no. of terms?

Simple example:

The average of x and y is 10. The average of y and z is 18. And the average of x and z is 20. What is the average of x, y and z?"

you can easily add the sums, divide by 2 then by 3. But the OA takes the average of these averages, which is the same in calculation but I don't get the concept underlying it.

Thanks
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:25 pm
Location: USA
Thanked: 28 times
GMAT Score:770

by goalevan » Sat Jul 02, 2011 4:38 pm
It's just a slightly different way of making the calculation. The way you calculated, you just multiplied by 2 to get the sum for each of the three statements before you added them. The OA adds them before it multiplies out the 2.

Adding the statements:
x + y = 20
y + z = 36
x + z = 40
--------------------
2(x + y + z) = 96
(x + y + z) = 48
(x + y + z)/3 = 16

Taking the average of the averages, you leave the /2 in each term:
[(x + y)/2 + (y + z)/2 + (x + z)/2] / 3 = (20/2 + 36/2 + 40/2) / 3
[2(x + y + z) / 2] / 3 = 48/3
(x + y + z)/3 = 16

Both methods just happen to bring you to the answer.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:14 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:5 members

by MBA.Aspirant » Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:41 pm
Thanks man. I know by calculation that both are same. I want to know the concept behind taking the avg of the averages here.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:14 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:5 members

by MBA.Aspirant » Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:19 am
bump
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sun Jul 03, 2011 6:06 am
Hi,
There is no underlying concept in this. It is just the same thing interpreted in two ways. So, no need to worry about any concept here.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 1:14 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:5 members

by MBA.Aspirant » Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:49 am
I just learned from Kaplan that you can take the average of the averages when the sets have equal no. of terms. Like in two sets of 60 items combined. Avg of new Set = Avg Set A +Avg Set B/ 2

If the no. of terms aren't equal in both sets, then it's weighted average.

now can someone tell me how this apply to this example?

The average of x and y is 10. The average of y and z is 18. And the average of x and z is 20. What is the average of x, y and z?
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:59 pm
2(x+y+z) = 20+36+40 = 96
x+y+z = 48

thus (x+y+z)/3 = 48/3=16
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1