BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Divisibility Problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatfeel » Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:38 am
From STMT (1)
IF x=y=1, then x+y=2, xy=1
IF x=y=2, then x+y=4, xy=4
IF x=y=3, then x+y=6, xy=9

NOT SUFFICIENT

FROM STMT (2)
x+y > x^2+y^2
x+y > (x+y)^2 + 2xy
x+y > 2xy
so we can infer that x+y > xy

SUFFICIENT

Hence the answer is b
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:26 pm
a for non negative 0 to comes into picture.

hence x=y=0 and x=y=1 give different solutions. not sufficient.

b x+y > x^2+y^2 meaning 0<x,y<1.
hence,

checking for x=0.2 and y=0.4 gives x+y > xy always.

sufficient. C it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:21 am
gmatfeel wrote:From STMT (1)
IF x=y=1, then x+y=2, xy=1
IF x=y=2, then x+y=4, xy=4
IF x=y=3, then x+y=6, xy=9

NOT SUFFICIENT

FROM STMT (2)
x+y > x^2+y^2
x+y > (x+y)^2 + 2xyx+y > 2xy
so we can infer that x+y > xy

SUFFICIENT

Hence the answer is b
wouldnt the red coloured equation be ](x+y)^2 - 2xy
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:59 am
Ozlemg wrote:
gmatfeel wrote:From STMT (1)
IF x=y=1, then x+y=2, xy=1
IF x=y=2, then x+y=4, xy=4
IF x=y=3, then x+y=6, xy=9

NOT SUFFICIENT

FROM STMT (2)
x+y > x^2+y^2
x+y > (x+y)^2 + 2xyx+y > 2xy
so we can infer that x+y > xy

SUFFICIENT

Hence the answer is b
wouldnt the red coloured equation be ](x+y)^2 - 2xy
Hi,
I guess that was a typo.
x+y > x^2+y^2
=> x+y > (x-y)^2 + 2xy
As (x-y)^2 >= 0, (x-y)^2 + 2xy >= 2xy which in turn is twice xy and hence at least as much as xy.
So, x+y > xy

Hence, B
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by blackjack » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:24 am
Frankenstein wrote:
Ozlemg wrote:
gmatfeel wrote:From STMT (1)
IF x=y=1, then x+y=2, xy=1
IF x=y=2, then x+y=4, xy=4
IF x=y=3, then x+y=6, xy=9

NOT SUFFICIENT

FROM STMT (2)
x+y > x^2+y^2
x+y > (x+y)^2 + 2xyx+y > 2xy
so we can infer that x+y > xy

SUFFICIENT

Hence the answer is b
wouldnt the red coloured equation be ](x+y)^2 - 2xy
Hi,
I guess that was a typo.
x+y > x^2+y^2
=> x+y > (x-y)^2 + 2xy
As (x-y)^2 >= 0, (x-y)^2 + 2xy >= 2xy which in turn is twice xy and hence at least as much as xy.
So, x+y > xy


Hence, B
Could you please elaborate how did you get (x-y)^2 >= 0 in the picture?
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Thu Jul 14, 2011 7:48 am
blackjack wrote: Could you please elaborate how did you get (x-y)^2 >= 0 in the picture?
Hi,
It is the square of a number (x-y). It is always non-negative(>=0) irrespective of whether (x-y) is negative or positive.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:14 am
If X and Y are non-negative,is (X+Y) greater then XY?
1. X=Y
2. X+y is greater than X^2+Y^2

For the first statement you can simply plug in numbers - keeping in mind that the test is probably testing 0 or 1.

x = 0, y=0 then 0 = 0
x=1, y = 1 then 2 > 1

So insufficient.

Then look at statement 2 - the others have done the algebra but look at the concept. The only way for x + y to be greater than x(x) + y(y) is if x and y are fractions. They can't be negatives because the square will always be greater, they can't be positive integers becuase the square will always be greater and they can't be 0 or 1 because the square will always be equal, not less - thus the only way for the squares to be less than the original number is when the original number is a fraction. when you add positive fractions then sum is greater, when you multiply positive fractions less than one the result is smaller - thus if x and y must be fractions then x + y must be greater than x(y)

B is the answer.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:55 am
tpr-becky wrote:
Then look at statement 2 - the others have done the algebra but look at the concept. The only way for x + y to be greater than x(x) + y(y) is if x and y are fractions.
That's not quite right. If x + y is greater than x^2 + y^2, then it's certainly true that *one of* x or y is between 0 and 1. They do not both need to be between 0 and 1; it might be that x = 1/2, and y = 11/10, for example.

Still, as long as we know that one of our two letters is between 0 and 1, we can be certain that xy is less than x + y (since if, say, 0 < x < 1, then xy < y < x + y must be true), so a conceptual approach works well here.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion