BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Adjective clause

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:04 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members

Adjective clause

by venmic » Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:28 am
American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs.

(A) American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs
(B) American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories that combine stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs into a characterization
(C) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs into a characterization
(D) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories that are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs
(E) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which, characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs


D

please explain
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:21 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by rohit_gmat » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:11 am
venmic wrote:American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs.

(A) American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs
(B) American writer Donald Barthelme, who is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories that combine stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs into a characterization
(C) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs into a characterization
(D) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories that are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs
(E) American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories, which, characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs


D

please explain

A, B - are missing a verb.. its just saying "Donald Barthelme....."

C,E - fix the first part.. "Donald is renowned..." .. but in the second half they don't really mention what is it really about the epiphanic short stories.. (no verb)

D- fixes the problem by using "that are characterized"

hope my explanation helps... :S
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:51 am
IMO:D Parallel!!
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:10 pm
Let us start by getting the meaning of the sentence.

It means that American writer American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories. His short stories are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs. The sentence does use some not-so-common literary terms but do not let them bother you. Let us just concentrate on the broad meaning and the grammatical structure of the sentence.

Error Analysis: There are two relative pronoun modifiers in the sentences, "who is..." and "which are...". Since the relative pronoun clauses are always dependent clauses, this sentence lacks the main clause with a proper subject-verb pair. As you can see the subject -Donald Barthelme does not have a verb.

Choice A: The sentence is not grammatically correct because it has a fragment as discussed above.

Choice B: Same as Choice A

Choice C: Relative pronoun clause "which combining... characterization" again lacks a definite verb. "Combining" alone without any is/are/was/were/am cannot be a verb.

Choice D: Correct choice. "American writer... short stories" is the main clause with proper subject-verb pair Donald Barthelme - is renowned. Noun modifier "that are... playful non-sequiturs" correctly modifies "short stories". The sentence is clear and the meaning is effectively conveyed.

Choice E: Relative pronoun clause "which, characterized... non-sequiturs" lacks a definite verb. This choice is a fragment again.

Hope this helps. :)
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:04 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:2 members

by venmic » Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:37 pm
Thankyou all
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:32 am
Thanked: 5 times

by vishal.pathak » Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:19 am
e-GMAT wrote:Let us start by getting the meaning of the sentence.

It means that American writer American writer Donald Barthelme is renowned for his formally inventive, epiphanic short stories. His short stories are characterized by sentences combining stilted, academic language with playful non-sequiturs. The sentence does use some not-so-common literary terms but do not let them bother you. Let us just concentrate on the broad meaning and the grammatical structure of the sentence.

Error Analysis: There are two relative pronoun modifiers in the sentences, "who is..." and "which are...". Since the relative pronoun clauses are always dependent clauses, this sentence lacks the main clause with a proper subject-verb pair. As you can see the subject -Donald Barthelme does not have a verb.

Choice A: The sentence is not grammatically correct because it has a fragment as discussed above.

Choice B: Same as Choice A

Choice C: Relative pronoun clause "which combining... characterization" again lacks a definite verb. "Combining" alone without any is/are/was/were/am cannot be a verb.

Choice D: Correct choice. "American writer... short stories" is the main clause with proper subject-verb pair Donald Barthelme - is renowned. Noun modifier "that are... playful non-sequiturs" correctly modifies "short stories". The sentence is clear and the meaning is effectively conveyed.

Choice E: Relative pronoun clause "which, characterized... non-sequiturs" lacks a definite verb. This choice is a fragment again.

Hope this helps. :)
why is E a fragment. Cant we consider "is renowned" as the verb

Regards,
Vishal
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1