BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Quick question on Algebra that is slipping my mind.

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:11 pm
The temperature of a certain cup of coffee 10 minutes it was poured was 120 degree Fahrenheit> If temperature F of the coffee t minutes after it was poured can be determined by the formula F = 120*(2^-at) + 60where F is in degree Fahrenheit and a is a constant , then the temperature of the coffee 30 minutes after it was poured was how many degree Fahrenheit?
A. 65
B. 75
C. 80
D. 85
E. 90

Steps: 1) 120 = 120*(2^-10a) + 60
2) 2= 2*(2^-10a) + 1
3) 2^1-10a = 1
4) 10a =1

How did that individual go from step 2 to 3? I am failing to see the math here. I feel like maybe I am just missing something or perhaps I was taught a different way to do this in college Algebra. Wouldn't you subtract the one and get 1= 2*(2^-10a) Then get 1/2= 2^-10a, thus a=.1 So 1/2= 2^-1. If someone could please touch on this that would be great. Thus once you plug A in and t=30 it ends up being 60+15= 75. I will show this math if someone needs it on here but i believe this has already been posted. Just confused on the algebra and would like to know. Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Tommy Wallach » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:03 pm
Hey Bpolley,

Indeed, the math seems to have skipped a bunch of steps, but the end result is the same. Here's all the steps (as I see it)

2 = 2*(2^(-10a) + 1

1 = 2* (2^(-10a)

1/2 = 2^(-10a)

When you have a negative exponent, you take the reciprocal to the positive exponent:

1/2 = 1/(2^(10a))

Now cross-multiply:

2 = 2^(10A)

This is the same as:

2^1 = 2^(10A)

10A = 1

A = 1/10

Does that make more sense?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:25 pm
Tommy,

I think your math is the same as mine. I guess I don't see how he ever got 2^(1-10a) ever. It is immaterial, but I thought it would be interesting to know if there was a second method in solving this, because I still don't see how he got to that. Thanks for the hasty reply.
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:56 pm
I'm guessing it was just a typo when he was writing his explanation. He got the right answer, so his math had to be correct in the end.

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:31 pm
That makes sense to me Tommy. Again, thanks for the fast reply. Didn't really seem to me as if there was another way to do that problem, thanks for the conformation. It is always nice to hear intelligent people agreeing with you.
Join the discussion