BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 13 79- Simpler way to solve this

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ygdrasil24 » Mon Jun 03, 2013 9:56 pm
[email protected] wrote:Hi Experts,


COuld you please suggest an easier way to solve this, Should I apply the similar tirangle theorem?
How do you find these triangles to be similar ??
I found a way to solve this by simple calculation taking two statements together. But could not figure out anything by similarity of triangles.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:10 am
But then what is the way to solve?


Could I ask the experts to please respond :(
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:53 am
[email protected] wrote:Hi Experts,


COuld you please suggest an easier way to solve this, Should I apply the similar tirangle theorem?
∆ABC = ∆ABD?

Since ∆ABC= (1/2)(AC)(BC) and ∆ABD = (1/2)(AB)(AD), we get:
(1/2)(AC)(BC) = (1/2)(AB)(AD)?

Question rephrased: Does (AC)(BC) = (AB)(AD)?

Statement 1: (AC²) = 2(AD²)
Thus:
AC = √2(AD).
No information about BC and AB.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: ∆ABC is isosceles
In an isosceles right triangle, the sides are proportioned x : x : x√2.
Since the length of the hypotenuse of ∆ABC is equal to √2 times the length of each leg, we get:
AB = √2(BC)
BC = (AB)/√2.
No information about AD.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Multiplying AC = √2(AD) by BC = (AB)/√2, we get:
(AC)(BC) = √2(AD) * (AB)/√2
(AC)(BC) = (AD)(AB).
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion