BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Emp Salary

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:550

Emp Salary

by hariharakarthi » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:21 am
Barnes: The two newest employees at this company
have salaries that are too high for the simple
tasks normally assigned to new employees and
duties that are too complex for inexperienced
workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity
of the duties of these two newest employees
should be reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on
which Barnes’s argument depends?
(A) The duties of the two newest employees are not
less complex than any others in the company.
(B) It is because of the complex duties assigned
that the two newest employees are being paid
more than is usually paid to newly hired
employees.
(C) The two newest employees are not experienced
at their occupations.
(D) Barnes was not hired at a higher-than-average
starting salary.
(E) The salaries of the two newest employees are no
higher than the salaries that other companies
pay for workers with a similar level of
experience.

OA: C
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:38 pm
Thanked: 6 times

by chetanojha » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:33 am
(A) This supports the reason why new employee have higher salary. So this cannot be the answer
(B) This argument again support the reason behing the high salary of new employees and not the Barnes argument.
(C) "The two newest employees are not experienced at their occupations" This should be the assumption which strengthen the Barnes argument.
(D) Barnes salary was not mentioned in the statement.
(E) This argument waeken Barnes argument instead of supporting it.
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:56 am
Location: Lucknow

by tenaman10 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:32 am
C is the best choice ...resoning is as follows :-
New employee usually handles simple task and hence high salaries are not justified ..moreover they are not in position to handle complex task thus should not be offered high salary ..

Here the argument assumption is that two new employee dont have pertinent experience and thus should be considered as inexperienced .

Hope that helps !!
"CEO In Making"
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:48 am
B seems to be a nice assumption as otherwise author soudn't have attacked both.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:02 pm
I chose B as well.

My reason was not going with C.
the argument mentions "inexperienced workers" and assumptions are never stated in the argument.
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:28 pm
I go with B) too

IMO C) cant be assumption since Barnes mentions that 2 new employees are assigned duties that are too complex for inexperienced
workers. I am thinking the company thinks of these new employees as experienced workers as experienced workers may be new eompoyess of a certain company.

B corelates the salaries and the complexity levels and qualifies for a good assumption .

I must be missing something in this transalation if indeed the OA is correct.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:53 pm
Barnes: The two newest employees at this company
have salaries that are too high for the simple
tasks normally assigned to new employees and
duties that are too complex for inexperienced
workers. Hence, the salaries and the complexity
of the duties of these two newest employees
should be reduced.

premises: too high salary
premises2: too complex for inexperineced

conclusion: salaries reduced....complexities reduced.


Which one of the following is an assumption on
which Barnes’s argument depends?


(C) The two newest employees are not experienced
at their occupations.

try negating C and you will see that the conclusion falters...
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:02 pm
Ronnie,
It has to do the interpretation of this sentence(my interpretration above may have been skewed):

The two newest employees at this company
have salaries that are too high for the simple
tasks normally assigned to new employees and
duties that are too complex for inexperienced
workers

I can see now why C) could be an assumption.i.e these 2 workers are inexperienced but the duties assigned to them dont reflect that as they may be complex in nature


Not fully convinced on ruling out B) but hey there can be only one right answer :-) The conslusion never brings up experience and hence the dilemma between B and C

Anyone else?
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gg1 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:04 am
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:19 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gg1 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:07 am
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:21 am
Here, author played a shell game. Two newest employees can be either experienced or in-experienced. if two newest employees are experienced, then there is not problem.

So, Two newest employees are not experienced. C is the correct answer.

We can do denial test for B and C.

If we negate C, then conclusion will failed. why need to reduce duties? -> No needed. TAKE IT

B has no effect as they have just compared about salary. Duty is main concern. ELIMINATE IT.

Indeed, OA is C.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:07 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:3 members

by GmatVerbal » Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:07 pm
This is a fairly old post. I came across this question in LSAT prep test and found interesting.

Even though, its clear that (C) is an assumption. Its wasn't clear for a while, why (B) couldn't be an assumption, because on what basis the argument is made to reduce the salary??

I think there are two parallel arguments are present;

The salaries are higher than normal new employee salaries --> so reduce the salary.
[ this argument as assumption that all new employees should be paid similar salaries] and (B) is not the assumption.

There duties complex for an in experienced professional -> so assign simple tasks.
[ This argument has assumption that these are inexperienced employees]
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 626
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Ahmedabad
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:10 members

by ronnie1985 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:17 am
(B) is right
From the argument we get that the salaries of the employees are high as compared to other new joinees, but they were also handling more complex portfolios. Hence salary and complexity of job are related.
Follow your passion, Success as perceived by others shall follow you
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:47 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by ArunangsuSahu » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:28 am
Let's deconstruct the CR:

1. Salary paid is too high compared to what is paid to the other new employees with normal tasks
2. Tasks assigned are too complex for the normal inexperienced workers.

There can be an Alternate reasoning that 2 new employees are EXPERIENCED.

But BARNES has reached a CONCLUSION that both the SALARY and the COMPLEXITY of the job SHOULD BE REDUCED

ASSUMPTION: SO BARNES' ASSUMPTION is that the 2 NEW EMPLOYEES are INEXPERIENCED
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1