BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Genetic modifications

Expert replies

by kevincanspain » Sun May 30, 2010 12:00 am
gmat009 wrote:Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to increase its resistance to insect pests. According to farmers� reports, the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not. Therefore, since the modified seed costs more than ordinary seed without
producing yields of higher market value, switching to the modified seed would be unlikely to benefit most cotton farmers economically.
Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?
A. Whether farmers who tried the modified cotton seed had ever tried growing other crops from genetically modified seed
B. Whether the insecticides typically used on ordinary cotton tend to be more expensive than insecticides typically used on other crops
C. Whether for most farmers who grow cotton it is their primary crop
D. Whether the farmers who have tried the modified seed planted as many acres of cotton, on average, as farmers using the ordinary seed did
E. Whether most of the farmers who tried the modified seed did so because they had previously had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide
This argument assumes that the fields in which insecticide was used do not differ from the others in terms of insect infestation. E, the correct answer, addresses this crucial assumption. If E is true, that farmers who tried the modified seed would have had to use SUBSTANTIALLY more insecticide to deal with the insects. I don't see the relevance of of B, as we are talking only about cotton. The information is given on a per acre basis, so D is irrelevant, too.
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sun May 30, 2010 3:33 am
kevincanspain wrote:
gmat009 wrote:Scientists have made genetic modifications to cotton to increase its resistance to insect pests. According to farmers� reports, the amount of insecticide needed per acre to control insect pests was only slightly lower for those who tried the modified seed than for those who did not. Therefore, since the modified seed costs more than ordinary seed without
producing yields of higher market value, switching to the modified seed would be unlikely to benefit most cotton farmers economically.
Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the argument?
A. Whether farmers who tried the modified cotton seed had ever tried growing other crops from genetically modified seed
B. Whether the insecticides typically used on ordinary cotton tend to be more expensive than insecticides typically used on other crops
C. Whether for most farmers who grow cotton it is their primary crop
D. Whether the farmers who have tried the modified seed planted as many acres of cotton, on average, as farmers using the ordinary seed did
E. Whether most of the farmers who tried the modified seed did so because they had previously had to use exceptionally large quantities of insecticide
This argument assumes that the fields in which insecticide was used do not differ from the others in terms of insect infestation. E, the correct answer, addresses this crucial assumption. If E is true, that farmers who tried the modified seed would have had to use SUBSTANTIALLY more insecticide to deal with the insects. I don't see the relevance of of B, as we are talking only about cotton. The information is given on a per acre basis, so D is irrelevant, too.
I think arg already says that when using the genetic crops the insecticide used is slightly lower than used for ordinary seed....then how is it E here??...
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sun May 30, 2010 8:19 am
E gives us reason to believe that the modified seed was planted in fields that are especially prone to insects.

Larry: I don't believe that taking a GMAT course will improve your score much. My study of thousands of GMAT-takers from all over the world reveal that those who took a GMAT course scored, on average, only 2 points higher than those who did not take a course.

Karen :I don´t question your findings, but rather what can be inferred from them. You may be overlooking the possibility that people who decide not to take a GMAT course are more...
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sun May 30, 2010 9:39 am
D in particular is irrelevant because total number of acres doesn't matter when the discussion is about "amount of insecticide needed per acre".
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion