BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Arithmetic Estimation (sum of consecutive intergers)

Expert replies
by matteomasciotti » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:48 am
Hi everyone,
I found this "simple" problem in the OG13 pretty annoying; it states the following;

M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300 inclusive. Which of the following is true?
A) 1/3 <M 1/2
B)1/5<M<1/3
C)1/7 <M< 1/5
D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
E) 1/12 <M< 1/9

So I decided to solve the problem this way:
1) find the midpoint in the sequence so (1/201 +1/300)/2
2) find the number of numbers in the sequence (300-201) +1
3) multiply the midpoint of the sequence times the number of numbers...and I get 0.83, which is not included in the options above.
I Looked at the solution at the end of the book and found a much simpler way to compute this whole summation...but...why is my techique wrong in this case?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:52 am
matteomasciotti wrote:Hi everyone,
I found this "simple" problem in the OG13 pretty annoying; it states the following;

M is the sum of the reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 201 to 300 inclusive. Which of the following is true?
A) 1/3 <M 1/2
B)1/5<M<1/3
C)1/7 <M< 1/5
D) 1/9 < M < 1/7
E) 1/12 <M< 1/9
We want to find 1/201 + 1/202 + 1/203 + . . . + 1/299 + 1/300

NOTE: there are 100 fractions in this sum.

Let's examine the extreme values (1/201 and 1/300)

First consider a case where all of the values are equal to the smallest fraction (1/300)
We get: 1/300 + 1/300 + 1/300 + ... + 1/300 = 100/300 = 1/3
So, the original sum must be greater than 1/3

Now consider a case where all of the values are equal to the biggest fraction (1/201)
In fact, let's go a little bigger and use 1/200
We get: 1/200 + 1/200 + 1/200 + ... + 1/200 = 100/200 = 1/2
So, the original sum must be less than 1/2

Combine both cases to get 1/3 < M < 1/2 = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by matteomasciotti » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:01 pm
Thanks Brent!
This is also the solution provided by the Official guide...But I was wondering why my method doesn't work in this case.
The number of numbers is still 100 in the sequence , even if the numbers are reciprocals of integers and hence fractions. So...?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:10 pm
matteomasciotti wrote: So I decided to solve the problem this way:
1) find the midpoint in the sequence so (1/201 +1/300)/2
2) find the number of numbers in the sequence (300-201) +1
3) multiply the midpoint of the sequence times the number of numbers...and I get 0.83, which is not included in the options above.
I Looked at the solution at the end of the book and found a much simpler way to compute this whole summation...but...why is my techique wrong in this case?
The problem here is that you're treating the sequence 1/201, 1/202, 1/203, . . . 1/299, 1/300 as one that decreases at constant rate. In actuality, the difference between successive varies from term to term.

Granted, the sequence 201, 202, 203, . . . 300 increases at a constant rate (the difference between successive is always 1). So, one way to find the sum of these values is to find the midpoint (middle term) and then multiply this number by 100.

However, this strategy doesn't work if the sequence does not change at a constant rate.

Consider this example: {1, 1/10, 1/100}
Using your method, the "midpoint" is [1 + 1/100]/2 = 0.505
So, the sum = (3)(0.505) = 1.515

However, the real sum here is 1.11

I hope that helps.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by matteomasciotti » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:27 pm
Thanks Brent,
Now I got it
sorry about the "midpoint" :)
Join the discussion

by ritind » Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:05 pm
There's one more way
we know the terms are in AP
sum of terms = [no of terms(first term + last term)]/2
first term = 1/201
last term = 1/300
no of terms = 100
Put the values in formula
sum of terms = 0.41
option A 0.33<0.41<0.5
OA is A
Join the discussion

by puneetkhurana2000 » Mon Dec 24, 2012 11:12 pm
There's one more way
we know the terms are in AP
sum of terms = [no of terms(first term + last term)]/2
first term = 1/201
last term = 1/300
no of terms = 100
Put the values in formula
sum of terms = 0.41
option A 0.33<0.41<0.5
OA is A
The terms are not in AP, the question is about reciprocals. 1/202 - 1/201 is not equal to 1/203 - 1/202.

Hope this makes sense!!!
Join the discussion