BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Inequality question

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:42 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Inequality question

by Stockmoose16 » Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:56 pm
In the MGMAT inequality book, it states that you can't simply isolate the X variable in the following equation, because it could be + or -:

xy<3y

Instead, it says you should factorize the equation:

xy-3y<0

=y(x-3)<0

Then it says, "y and x-3 have opposite signs"... where did they come up with that?

Isn't x-3<0, which means x<3 (meaning, it could be a positive or negative number...

And y<0, which means it's negative.

Why is the book saying that they have opposite signs? They MAY have opposite signs, but that's not definitive, right?

What would be the correct answer to the original question?
Top
Source: — Problem Solving |
Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members

by parallel_chase » Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:29 pm
Here are four rules of inequalities that will help you answer above question:

(+)*(-) < 0 ----I
(-)*(+) < 0 ----II
(-)*(-) > 0 ----III
(+)*(+)>0 ----IV


y(x-3)<0

if y is positive, x-3 has to be negative
if y is negative, x-3 has to be positive
refer to cases I & II

Thats why it says "y and x-3 have opposite signs".

Hope this helps. Let me know if you still have any doubts.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1