BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x a positive number?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by nitya34 » Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:39 am
E?
(1)-->x>-4
(2)-->-5>x>5

is it so simple?or any trap?
Join the discussion

by bstalling » Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:40 am
Statement 1 says x+6>2, thus x>-4, not sufficient

Statement 2 says -5>x>5

Combining them does nothing.
Choose E.
Join the discussion

by karmayogi » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:20 am
1. x > -4
2. x^2 > 25
(+ or - ) x > 5
-x > 5 or x > 5
x < -5 or x > 5

1. Not sufficient
2. Not sufficient
1 & 2
x > -4 and (x<-5) => not possible
x > 4 and x > 5 => x>5
That is, x = +ve

IMO C.
Each soul is potentially divine. The goal is to manifest this divine within.
--By Swami Vivekananda
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:16 pm
E for me as well

St 1: x>-4..insuff
St2: -5<x<5..insuff

Combining we get: -4<x<5..insuff

So E.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:59 pm
mals24 wrote:E for me as well

St 1: x>-4..insuff
St2: -5<x<5..insuff

Combining we get: -4<x<5..insuff

So E.
First of all, Karmayogi analyzed the Statement 2 correctly
2. x^2 > 25
(+ or - ) x > 5
-x > 5 or x > 5
x < -5 or x > 5

Now lets combine these two lines


..........-4.........0.................................

.....-5...............0....................5............


X>5

I would say C
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Mar 16, 2009 2:18 pm
Stmt I

x > -4
could be positive or negative

INSUFF

Stmt II

x^2 > 25

|x| > 5

could be positive or negative

INSUFF

Together:

x > - 4

|x| > 5

x has to be greater than +5

I would go with C too.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:45 pm
I too selected C as my answer, but the OA is given as E.

if x^2 > 25
then x> +5 or -5 i.e. x>-5 or x>5. Is this not correct? How is it that combining both the statements is not sufficient to answer the question?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:03 pm
too selected C as my answer, but the OA is given as E.

if x^2 > 25
then x> +5 or -5 i.e. x>-5 or x>5. Is this not correct? How is it that combining both the statements is not sufficient to answer the question?
x^2 > 25

|x| > 5

x>5 or x<-5

Since x>-4 is given x>5


The 2 statements will never contracdict each other i.e they will have something in common

x>-4 and x>5 is the common thing between stmt I and II and they dont contardict i.e something can be greater than -4 and 5 at the same time.

Probably we can request Ian/Stuart to clarify the C or E part for us.

Regards,
Cramya
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:07 pm
Can u double check the question?

If stmt II was x^2<25

|x| < 5

x<5 x>-5

-5<x<5 would hold along with x>-4 which will make it insufficient leading to E.
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:22 pm
cramya wrote:Can u double check the question?

If stmt II was x^2<25

|x| < 5

x<5 x>-5

-5<x<5 would hold along with x>-4 which will make it insufficient leading to E.
Good shot cramya :wink: Unfortunately, I did not make any mistake in posting the question as is. The source is princeton guide. Its an exercise question with no explanation to the answers. If there are no answers that support E, I will assume that it was a mistake in the book.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:40 pm
cramya wrote:Can u double check the question?

If stmt II was x^2<25

|x| < 5

x<5 x>-5

-5<x<5 would hold along with x>-4 which will make it insufficient leading to E.
If the answer is E, the book has a typo as described by Cramya.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion