BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Frances Perkins’ investigations

Expert replies

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:05 am
Optimus Prime wrote:The problem is from GMAT PREP
hmm
i did some searching on the web and found that this problem is from "gmat sets" -- older, secondhand questions.
while most of the problems in those sets are decent, many of them reflect priorities and/or writing conventions that are no longer seen in current questions, so i'd hesitate to draw any strong conclusions from this problem.

are you saying that this problem is in the current edition of GMAT PREP? if so, are there any existing screenshots that you (or anyone else) could upload as proof?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:48 am
Hi Ron,
The question is indeed from the current version of GMATPrep.
I have attached a copy as evidence.

Thanks as I look forward to your informative contributions.
Attachments
so dogged were frances.JPG
Join the discussion

by amir_hatef » Sun Dec 05, 2010 1:52 pm
Nazarft7: could you please give me your explanation on this regard and then rule out this in general. Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by fitzgerald23 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:52 pm
I think this is one that can be solved easily by POE, but it does sound a bit strange since normally you would think there would be an "and" between the two clauses. Im guessing that when you are stating something with extra emphasis you can avoid the and. So dogged her investigations (!), so persistent her lobbying (!), that...
Join the discussion

by Rezinka » Sun Dec 05, 2010 11:14 pm
Isn't this the case of simple parallellism that we encounter in some books.

Like..
So desperate was her need, so sincere were her attempts, that she could not have failed the scholarship examination.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Dec 09, 2010 2:54 pm
gmatdriller wrote:Hi Ron,
The question is indeed from the current version of GMATPrep.
I have attached a copy as evidence.

Thanks as I look forward to your informative contributions.
ok. well, if i were you, i would just remember this construction for the future.

the poster above is correct, though: even though this sentence features a very weird construction, it can still be solved with garden-variety parallelism.
in fact, in this problem it's extra clear that the correct answer is the one that's most parallel; the other four choices are nowhere close to being properly parallel. i have the feeling they may have done this to make up for the strangeness of the construction; i.e., because the construction of the whole sentence is rather unfamiliar, they made the parallelism extra obvious in order to make up for that.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion