BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP I ARRANGEMENTS / PERMUTATION

Expert replies
by pkw209 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:49 pm
Hi all,

Couldn't figure this one out. I got to 16,302 but couldn't figure out how to also account for those 3 letter codes that multiple letters. A brief explanation would be appreciated. FYI, I took this directly from Zuleron's list of 198 gmat prep questions. Thanks!

93) Each stack is designated with a 1, 2, and 3 letter code where each letter is selected from the 26 letters of the alphabet. If the letters may be repeated and if the same letters used in a different order constitutes a different code, how many different stocks is it possible to uniquely designate with these codes?

a. 2951
b. 8125
c. 15600
d. 16302
e. 18278
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by pkw209 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:54 pm
Sorry, just to clarify, the answer is E.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:46 pm
What's potentially confusing here is the wording of the question. I think it should read "1, 2, OR 3 letter codes".

Because letters can be repeated, looking at the three letter codes, we have: 26*26*26. For the two letter codes: 26*26. For the one letter code: 26. Then, sum them up.

You don't have to do all of that. Cube 26 is 17576. You know the answer must be greater than that.

Quickest way (no messy multiplying): Because 6*6 is 36, all powers of 6 have 6 as their last digit. So, for 26^3 the last digit is 6; same for 26^2; same for 26. When we sum these up, the sum of our units digits will be 6 + 6 + 6 = 18. Thus, the last digit of our final result has to be 8....choose E.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by pkw209 » Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:12 pm
an ah-ha moment just hit :)
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:29 am
I understand what you are saying Testluv, but what if you make a mistake in your calculation to begin with, and are not on target for the estimation. Don't you find it useful to confirm values? I understand that Data Sufficiency is amenable to estimation, but problem solving seems more absolute. Feelings?
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:40 am
artistocrat wrote:I understand what you are saying Testluv, but what if you make a mistake in your calculation to begin with, and are not on target for the estimation. Don't you find it useful to confirm values? I understand that Data Sufficiency is amenable to estimation, but problem solving seems more absolute. Feelings?
In PS, we should use estimation in those questions that ask us to find "approximate" values.

However, in PS, we should always use reasoning. In general, in PS we should be open to alternative approaches such as using logic, using the answer choices + logic, picking numbers, etc. Here, I used knowledge of bases and powers and logic, and it certainly would save me time, thereby raising my score. :)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion