This is a tough problem to solve algebraically. I just go through the answers, using plug and chug.
Consider each option:
A. x can equal w. Assume y is 2 (integers 2 and 3) which means that x=5. Based on that assumption for A to be possible z must equal 1. So is there one single consecutive integer that equals 5? Yes it is five.
B. x can be > w. Assume y is 2 (integers 2 and 3) which means that x=5. Based on that assumption for A to be possible z must equal 1. So is there one single consecutive integer (w) that is less than 5 (x)? Yes, there are multiple: 4, 3, 2, 1.
C. x/y cannot be an integer. Since y is double z, y must be an even number. This is key. For example if y were 3, z would be 1.5, which is not possible since z is a positive integer. So assume y is 2. In that case are there any two consecutive integers whose sum is divisible by 2. No. Two consecutive integers will always sum to an odd number (even+odd=odd). This means x must be an odd number and y must be an even number. No odd number can be divided by an even number and produce an integer. C is not possible, so C is the correct answer.
D. w/z can be an integer since z can be odd or even, which means that w can be odd or even. If z is odd, let's say 3, can we come up with three consecutive integers whose sum is divisible by 3? Yes. 1+2+3=6/3=2. In fact the sum of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 3.
E. x/z can be an integer. If z is 1, then it doesn't matter what x is, x/z=x, which is an integer.