BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

probability

Expert replies
by Ramit88 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:45 am
A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marble, and r red marble. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white?

(1) r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)

(2) b-w > r


[spoiler]ANS:A[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Jan 23, 2011 9:17 am
Ramit88 wrote:A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marble, and r red marble. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white?

(1) r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)

(2) b-w > r
Probability that the marble chosen will be red P(r) = r/(b + r + w)
Probability that the marble chosen will be white P(w) = w/(b + r + w)

Statement 1: r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)
Implies, (b + w)/r < (b + r)/w
Adding 1 to each side, 1 + (b + w)/r < 1 + (b + r)/w
=> (r + b + w)/r < (w + b + r)/w
=> r/(b + r + w) > w/(b + r + w)
=> P(r) > P(w)

Sufficient

Statement 2: (b - w) > r
Doesn't imply anything relevant.

Not Sufficient

The correct answer is A.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:23 am
Ramit88 wrote:A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marble, and r red marble. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white?

(1) r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)

(2) b-w > r


[spoiler]ANS:A[/spoiler]
# OUTCOMES is unknown, P(R) > P(W) with one selection ?
st(1) w(b+w)>r(b+r) --> wb+w^2-br-r^2>0 --> (w-r)(w+r) + b(w-r)>0 --> (w-r)(w+r+b)>0
w-r<0 AND w+r+b<0 --> cancel this branch as the total is less than 1
OR
w-r>0 AND w+r+b>0 --> w>r the, hence the number of white marbles is greater than the number of red marbles P(w)>P(r) Sufficient
st(2) b-w>r we don't know the number of white and red marbles, hence probabilistic model fails here Not sufficient

IOM A
Join the discussion

by aleph777 » Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:33 am
Nice problem.

First thing I did was break down the question. What is it really asking? Well, in order for the probability of red to be greater than the probability of white, the jar simply needs to have more red than white marbles.

So the question is really just asking is r > w?

STATEMENT 1:
r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)

Since we know all variables are positive, we can cross multiply:

r^2 +rb > w^2 + wb

Since the equation is doing the same thing on the left to red as it is to white on the right (squaring and then adding the product of r or w and blue), the equation prove that, all things similar, red is greater than white.

SUFFICIENT

STATEMENT 2:
b-w > r

No matter how we spin this, we can't learn anything about the relationship between r and w.

INSUFFICIENT

Answer: A
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:48 am
Ramit88 wrote:A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marble, and r red marble. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white?

(1) r/(b + w) > w/(b + r)

(2) b-w > r


[spoiler]ANS:A[/spoiler]
Very little math is needed. Just use common sense.

Rewritten, the question is asking: Is R>W?

Statement 1:
Tells us that the ratio of R to the other marbles is greater than the ratio of W to the other marbles. Thus, R>W. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
Tells us that B > R+W. No way to determine whether R>W. Insufficient.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion