lark manufacturing

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

lark manufacturing

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:53 am
Lark Manufacturing Company initiated a voluntary Quality Circles program for machine operators. Independent surveys of employee attitudes indicated that the machine operators participating in the program were less satisfied with their work situations after two years of the program's existence than they were at the program's start. Obviously, any workers who participate in a Quality Circles program will, as a result, become less satisfied with their jobs.
Each of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion drawn above EXCETP:

A The second survey occurred during a period of recession when rumors of cutbacks and layoffs at Lark Manufacturing were plentiful .
B The surveys also showed that those Lark machine operators who neither participated in Quality Circles nor knew anyone who did so reported the same degree of lessened satisfaction with their work situations as did the Lark machine operators who participated in Quality Circles.
C While participating in Quality Circles at Lark Manufacturing, machine operators exhibited two of the primary indicators of improved job satisfaction: increased productivity and decreased absenteeism.
D Several workers at Lark Manufacturing who had participated in Quality Circles while employed at other companies reported that, while participating in Quality Circles in their previous companies, their work satisfaction had increased.
E The machine operators who participated in Quality Circles reported that, when the program started, they felt that participation might improve their work situations.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:58 pm
Location: india
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:700

by moorthy76 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:56 am
is it E?
Best Regards,
Surya

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:32 am
conclusion: participation in Q cycle programs causes dissatisfaction with jobs

A. weakens. gives an alternative reason ie, recession for dissatisfaction

B. weakens. shows that non participation also causes same level of dissatisfaction. so participation is not necessarily the reason behind dissatisfaction

C. weakens. shows that partipation caused job satisfaction

D. weakens. shows that partipation in Q cycle, albeit from a different company caused job satisfaction

E. doesnt weaken. just shows expectations were not met. doesnt affect the conclusion.

hence E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:41 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:2 members

by anshulseth » Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:46 am
The answer is E.

Lets derive it from the standard patterns.
This is a question which lies under the category "Causation".

So, dissatisfaction is a cause of being a part of Quality Circle.
Any option which goes on the same line, will support it and thus will be the exception to the weaken the argument question.

A. Dissatisfaction is caused by sthg else and not QC.
B. Dissatisfaction not caused by QC, as can be seen from the case of other operators.
C. Talks of satisfaction and not dissatisfaction.
D. Again talks about satisfaction
E. Tells that there was some expectation when joining QC. But it was not met by QC, as can be seen from the arg that the satisfaction levels decreased in second survey.
So, they did not get what they expected from QC.
Thus, the dissatisfaction resulted from QC, and hence the answer.

Cheers
Asset

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:37 pm
OA is E, thanks guys.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Fri May 13, 2016 10:42 pm
I agree with you guys. I also think that the right answer is E