research and development:

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 3:22 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:3 members

research and development:

by \'manpreet singh » Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:35 am
Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 - when outlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

(A) Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.

(B) Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.

(C) Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.

(D) In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.

(E) Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.

OA D
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

by vinay1983 » Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:44 am
Conclusion: Tax credit of 25% had no effect on spend in research and development.

Fro this to be true, we should know whether the businesses in absence of tax credit are ready to spend on research and development, if no then the argument holds true.

D is on the same lines.
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!