BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please mark my first Issue essay

Expert replies
by s_raizada » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:04 pm
“In some countries, television and radio programs are carefully censored for offensive language and behavior. In
other countries, there is little or no censorship.”

In your view, to what extent should government or any other group be able to censor television or radio programs?
Explain, giving relevant reasons and/or examples to support your position.


Response
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my view, the extent to which govt or other group should be able to censor offensive language and behaviour should depend upon the target audience – children, adults – and the content – offensive to minority group or a particular section of the society - of the program.

First, we live in a civilized society, a society where there is no place for offensive language and behaviour. Aggressive behaviour and language are the tools used by people who can not convince others using logical reasoning to hurt or harm others. By showing such thing on television I don’t think we are setting good examples for our society to follow.

Second, offensive language and behaviour affect children. Television has great influence on children, because whatever they see on the television they tend to use in the real life. For example, while travelling on public transport, I hear so many young children using offensive language. Media is to some extent responsible for that.

Finally, offensive language and behaviour may influence others to perform similar actions in the real life. For example, some of the schools shootings in the US were as a result of people learning from aggressive behaviour seen in movies – probably shown on TV.

Some may argue, censorship of aggressive behaviour is against the freedom of expression or speech. Yet, if someone’s freedom of speech or expression is harmful for others then it is not worth it. Others may argue that by censoring violent behaviour and language we are pretending that such things do not exist in this world. However, we don’t have to glorify those bad things on TV.

In summary, censorship is necessary to make sure that aggressive behaviour and language do not hurt viewer’s sentiments.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

• Page 1 of 1