Part of the proposed increase in state education spending

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members
Part of the proposed increase in state education spending is due to higher enrollment, since the number of students in public schools have grown steadily since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, are at a record high.

(A) enrollment, since the number of students in public schools have grown steadily since the mid 1980's and, at nearly 47 million, are at

(B) enrollment, with a number of students in public schools growing steadily since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, reaching

(C) enrollment: since students in public schools have grown steadily in number since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, have reached

(D) enrollment: the number of students in public schools has grown steadily since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, has reached

(E) enrollment: students in public schools have grown steadily in number since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, are at

[spoiler]OA: Though I agree that correct answer is D but why is exactly C wrong????[/spoiler]
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:18 pm
Hi,
What follows a colon should be either an explanation or list of examples for the preceding independent clause.
And C says students have grown steadily in number, students have reached a record high. This is incorrect.
It is actually the number of students that has grown steadily and the number has reached a record-high.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:29 pm
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
What follows a colon should be either an explanation or list of examples for the preceding independent clause.
And C says students have grown steadily in number, students have reached a record high. This is incorrect.
It is actually the number of students that has grown steadily and the number has reached a record-high.
Thanks Frankenstein for ur response,please clear my few more doubts

1. Is since also used for giving reasons????
2. Is the part preceding a colon a independent clause???? Because I was aware that part preceding & succeeding a semi colon is always an Independent clause.Does the same hold true for colon also???

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:43 pm
Hi,
1. Is since also used for giving reasons????
I believe it can be used for giving reasons when it is used as sub-ordinating conjunction. That is the reason we cannot use this after colon in C. It can be used after comma to connect independent clause and another dependent clause.
2. Is the part preceding a colon a independent clause???? Because I was aware that part preceding & succeeding a semi colon is always an Independent clause.Does the same hold true for colon also???
The part preceding colon should definitely be an independent clause. The part after the colon can be either an explanatory clause or list of examples.

Would appreciate if an expert can confirm this.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
Thanked: 378 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:760

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:12 pm
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
1. Is since also used for giving reasons????
I believe it can be used for giving reasons when it is used as sub-ordinating conjunction. That is the reason we cannot use this after colon in C. It can be used after comma to connect independent clause and another dependent clause.
"since" definitely can be used to connect two clauses with a cause and effect relationship. Since I have grown 10 kilos in the last year, I started a diet.

In fact, that is the problem with C: the 'since' after the colon creates an expectation for a later clause that doesn't actually come up.

Since students have grown in number, and have achieved a record high... what? What happened because of this?

2. Is the part preceding a colon a independent clause???? Because I was aware that part preceding & succeeding a semi colon is always an Independent clause.Does the same hold true for colon also???
The part preceding colon should definitely be an independent clause. The part after the colon can be either an explanatory clause or list of examples.

Would appreciate if an expert can confirm this.
sounds about right.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:19 pm
Expert, pls, help
why B is wrong?

In addition, Pls, explain, the use of "with phrase" or more generally , the use of prepositional phrase

I think that "with phrase" can be a adjectival and a adverbial but do not know how to realize these functions. pls, help.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:25 am
duongthang wrote:Expert, pls, help
why B is wrong?

In addition, Pls, explain, the use of "with phrase" or more generally , the use of prepositional phrase

I think that "with phrase" can be a adjectival and a adverbial but do not know how to realize these functions. pls, help.
(B) enrollment, with a number of students in public schools growing steadily since the mid-1980's and, at nearly 47 million, reaching

For me, with [a] number looks ambiguous in B

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:13 am
Location: India
Thanked: 22 times
Followed by:7 members
GMAT Score:540

by sahilchaudhary » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:22 am
Hello,

There are 2 problems with B

1. adverbial clause "with....." incorrectly modifies " spending is"... does not make sense

2. a number of students .. growing... - Students are not growing, "the number of students is" is correct
tanviet wrote:Expert, pls, help
why B is wrong?

In addition, Pls, explain, the use of "with phrase" or more generally , the use of prepositional phrase

I think that "with phrase" can be a adjectival and a adverbial but do not know how to realize these functions. pls, help.
Sahil Chaudhary
If you find this post helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
https://www.sahilchaudhary007.blocked

• Page 1 of 1