Squares

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:10 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:5 members

by gmatblood » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:35 pm
IMO: B

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:44 pm
Great question! And nice work, gmatblood.

Here, I think it's pretty important to recognize when you see this setup:

-Dealing with squares of variables
-the real constraint is that "the variables are positive"

You recognize that for any values >1, squaring them makes them increase. But for positive values less than 1 (0 < x < 1), squaring them makes them decrease. It's a small band of numbers, but they react really differently so you want to be aware of that.

So with statement 1, it's pretty easy to get "No", as y could be 1,000,000 and x could be 1, and no way is x greater than y^2 there. But how could you start with y bigger than x^2 and end up with x bigger than y^2? Make them fractions: x = 1/2 and y = 2/3, so the statement is satisfied (y is bigger than x^2, which would be 1/4) but x is bigger than y^2 (which would be 4/9).

Statement 2, however, tells you that y is going to be greater than 1, since we know x at a minimum is a shade over 0 (maybe .000000001, with y then at 1.000000001). And since y will start bigger than x, and when we square it it will only increase, we know that y^2 will be bigger than x, so this time the answer is always "No". And the answer is B.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:10 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:5 members

by gmatblood » Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:01 pm
A compliment from an Expert is indeed motivating :) thanks Brain!! :D