BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

OG Question

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:22 pm
by aimhigh715 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:55 pm
A certain junior class has 1000 students and a certain senior class has 800 students. Among these students, there are 60 sibling pairs, each consisting of 1 junior and 1 senior. If 1 student is to be selected at random from each class, what is the probability that the 2 students will be a sibling pair?

a) 3/40000
b) 1/3600
c) 9/2000
d) 1/60
e) 1/15

Read the OE, didn't really get it? My answer was c) based on 60/1000 x 60/800... why not?
Work Hard, Play Harder!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:22 pm

by aimhigh715 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:57 pm
OE was A)

Nevermind I got it... reason why it was 60/1000 x 1/800 was because of the wording.

The pair HAS to be the actual sibling pair, NOT just any 2 people in a sibling pair relationship. Thus it is 1/800 for the second ratio... !!

nevermind :)
Work Hard, Play Harder!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times

by camitava » Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:07 am
aimhigh715, dnt mind! I am not getting ur solution. According to the Qs, Among these students, there are 60 sibling pairs, each consisting of 1 junior and 1 senior.
So there will be 30 students of senior class and other 30 of junior class. If so, then how come you are getting 60/1000? Again why 1/800? I am getting confused here. I think we need some more input here.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 195
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:33 am
Thanked: 10 times

by sankruth » Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:35 am
camitava wrote:aimhigh715, dnt mind! I am not getting ur solution. According to the Qs, Among these students, there are 60 sibling pairs, each consisting of 1 junior and 1 senior.
So there will be 30 students of senior class and other 30 of junior class. If so, then how come you are getting 60/1000? Again why 1/800? I am getting confused here. I think we need some more input here.
Amitava, 60 pairs mean 60 sets of siblings (so 120 in total, 60 in junior class, 60 in senior class.)

Now P(Getting a student from Junior who has a sibling in senior) = P(A) = 60/1000

Now since you have selected one student in the junior class, there will only be one student in senior class that will be his/her sibling...
P(B) = 1/800

P(A n B) = (60/1000).(1/800) = 60/800,000 = 3/400000
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times

by camitava » Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:38 am
Ok, sankruth! Thanks a lot. Now I understood. Sorry for my misunderstanding.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1