BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

CR 1

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by viju9162 » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:16 pm
Is the answer "D"?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:20 pm
D is the only one that comes close to weakening the argument.
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:01 pm
IMO C

Wht is wrong with C

The arg talks bout American cell phone manufacturers..while the conclusions talks bout the american companies as a whole....

I think C weakens the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:56 am
As the answer choices and the argument stand, C does not affect the argument in any way.
Join the discussion

by vcgmat » Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:36 am
Would agree with PAB2706.
I too noticed the difference in the premise and conclusion !
Ans: C
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:00 pm
had it been about weaken the conclusion, it would have been D. However here it is about weakening the argument and C stands out.

Answer should be C.

Whats the OA?
Sandy
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:22 pm
D for me, rest others are Out of Scope i think.
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:39 pm
OA is E
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:05 pm
madhur_ahuja wrote:OA is E
Interesting to see OA.

C --> American companies will see reduced profits FROM cell phone sales in Chinese market.

P --> Chinese manufacturers are becoming more productive and introducing new phones.

Scope shift --> conclusions all of a sudden introduces profits.

(C) will be out of scope as it talks about American companies which sell other electronic products.

IMO D.

E can be a choice only when I make additional assumptions that Chinese manufacturers buy electronic components from American companies that sell cell phones.

If there is any official explanations, pls post. Tx.
Last edited by crackgmat007 on Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:06 pm
crackgmat007 wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:OA is E
Interesting to see OA.

C --> American companies will see reduced profits FROM cell phone sales in Chinese market.

P --> Chinese manufacturers are more productive and introducing new phones.

Scope shift --> conclusions all of a sudden introduces profits.

(C) will be out of scope as it talks about American companies which sell other electronic products.

IMO D.

E can be a choice only when I make additional assumptions that Chinese manufacturers buy electronic components from US.

If there is any official explanations, pls post. Tx.
Yes, Even I am surprised by OA. I have the OE as well. Will post in few hours...
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:58 am
The OA is correct as the original argument states that the American companies might see reduced profits and not "american phone companies".

I hope u get the point.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:26 am
The OA is correct as the original argument states that the American companies might see reduced profits and not "american phone companies".

I hope u get the point.
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:29 am
the OA wud have been right if E used the word american....

when E talks bout such a generalised statement.... it goes out of scope...the word american is necessary...we cannot assume that E talks bout american electronic components....

wht is the source of this question?
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:04 am
PAB2706 wrote:the OA wud have been right if E used the word american....

when E talks bout such a generalised statement.... it goes out of scope...the word american is necessary...we cannot assume that E talks bout american electronic components....

wht is the source of this question?
Its the Peterson review Mock test. I will also post the OE.
Join the discussion