GMAT PREP Paper test question

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:20 pm
Location: fssf
Thanked: 17 times

GMAT PREP Paper test question

by krazy800 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:23 pm
This Q is from GmatPrep paper Test

Q1. There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990.
A) generated through wind power now than it was
B) generated through wind power now as it was
C) generated through wind power now as was the case
D) now generated through wind power as it was
E) now generated through wind power than was the case


Could some one explain the intent of the sentence? Please explain the logic behind the correct answer.

Thanks in advance for the help!!!!!
Aiming High
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:02 pm
Concept tested:

Ididom : -- As...X...as

As "Much" energy is generated through wind power now AS
.....

A ,E - out of wrong IDIOM
B,C and D use correct idiom.

Much :- modifying generated Energy, so we need something like

as much energy is generated through power now as energy was generated through power in 1990.

Now see what match near to this:-
B) generated through wind power now as it was

it :- refer to Energy
as much generated through wind power now as energy was in 1990.

compare total energy in 1990 , with currenty generated energy using wind power.

C) generated through wind power now as was the case

was the case :- energy generated using wind power in 1990.. correct comparison here.

D) same problem as that of B

IMO: C

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: GMAT PREP Paper test question

by lunarpower » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:35 am
krazy800 wrote:This Q is from GmatPrep paper Test

Q1. There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fossil fuels: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990.
A) generated through wind power now than it was
B) generated through wind power now as it was
C) generated through wind power now as was the case
D) now generated through wind power as it was
E) now generated through wind power than was the case


Could some one explain the intent of the sentence? Please explain the logic behind the correct answer.

Thanks in advance for the help!!!!!
ah. a clever question. clever mostly because it contains BOTH "more than" AND "as much as", requiring you to put in some extra effort to distinguish between the two.

fortunately, the "more than" is sitting there in one piece, so you can basically just ignore it and pretend that the sentence just says "ten times as much...".

with "as much", you need "as", not "than". so (a) and (e) are dead.

--


in any case, the choices with "it" are incorrect because the "it" doesn't have a legitimate antecedent.
pronouns automatically stand for nouns plus all the adjectives and essential modifiers that are attached to those nouns. therefore, "it", in this sentence, would have to stand for "more than ten times as much energy". that, of course, doesn't work.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:36 am
by the way

here's the most important takeaway from this problem:

if you see a split between
* a PRONOUN
and one of the following two:
* a specific noun;
* an abstract expression that's meant to substitute for a pronoun (such as "was the case" or "do so");

then you should be HIGHLY suspicious of the pronoun.


so, if you see "do so" vs. "do it", you should bank on "do so", unless you have VERY strong reasons to go the other way.
if you see "them" vs. "those NOUNs", you should bank on the latter, unless you have very strong reasons to go the other way.

same here.

--
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:20 pm
Location: fssf
Thanked: 17 times

by krazy800 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:04 am
Thanks Ron!!!!
Aiming High

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:48 am
Ple, help, I do not understand

if we use "was the case", "the case" is compared with "energy". This is incorrect

pls, help me out

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:43 pm
Thanked: 22 times
GMAT Score:710

Re: GMAT PREP Paper test question

by palvarez » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:14 pm
This is another trap that GMAT tests often.

In OG 10, there is a question about comparing the effects of earthquake wrt west n east coasts.

The concept tested is this: you have a comparative adjective modifying a noun; this noun phrase ( comp. Adj + noun) is referred to as "it" in the "as clause".

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

Re: GMAT PREP Paper test question

by tanviet » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:45 am
palvarez wrote:This is another trap that GMAT tests often.

In OG 10, there is a question about comparing the effects of earthquake wrt west n east coasts.

The concept tested is this: you have a comparative adjective modifying a noun; this noun phrase ( comp. Adj + noun) is referred to as "it" in the "as clause".
Is it the question 99 in OG10? pls, tell me the question so that I can study it. Thank

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:09 am
Sory, the question 199 in OG 10

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:58 am
Thank you Ron. It is wonderful to have you in this forum.

I have a question.

I see in many questions in OG, "that" can refer to only one word, a noun, not to a noun+modifier. "that" is a pronoun so I think "that" is a special.

Ron, Can you explain more about "that"

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:01 pm
Received a PM asking me to respond on how "energy" can be compared to "case."

"as was the case" is actually referring back to the first item in the comparison:

energy generated now
vs
energy generated in 1990

because they tell us that it's 10x now, we could also interpret this as:

10x energy generated now
vs
x energy generated in 1990

The reason we can't use "it" to refer to "x energy generated" is because "it" is a pronoun and can refer only to nouns. We're trying to refer to an entire clause (includes the verb "is generated"), so we can't use a simple pronoun. "was the case" is more flexible - that can actually refer to the whole clause, not just a noun.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

• Page 1 of 1