BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Automobile accident

Expert replies
by gmatblood » Sat Jul 23, 2011 6:55 am
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free
society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks.
As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the
increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate
of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are
passengers who do wear seat belts
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sandy217 » Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:24 am
Join the discussion

by Ozlemg » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:54 am
IMO B cos from the segment of sentence people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as but what we understand from B is that these people really harm others!! So it weakens the argument that as long as people do not harm!
And B explicitly talks about this...
Last edited by Ozlemg on Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)
Join the discussion

by gmatblood » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:12 pm
OA : B
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:15 pm
gmatblood wrote:Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free
society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks.
As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

A. Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
B. Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the
increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
C. Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
D. The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate
of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
E. In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are
passengers who do wear seat belts
B
Life is a Test
Join the discussion