BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

problem solving Q

Expert replies
by siddhartha123 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:40 am
Dear all,

How to solve it ,

Amy's grade was the 90th percentile of the 80 grades for her class; of the 100 grades
from another class,19 were higher than amy's and rest were lower,if no other grade was same
as ammy's grade, then amy's was what percentile of the grades of two cases combined?

[spoiler]Ans: 85 th[/spoiler]
M.siddhartha
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Bharath Krishnan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:41 am
In this question, percentile is calculated using the formula

number of candidates scored below Amy's grade
---------------------------------------------
total grades in the class

Class of 80
Amy's grade is 90th percentile of 80 grades - we do not know the number of candidates below Amy in this class.

x
--- (100) = 90.
80

Equating this we get 72.

Class of 100, there are 19 candidates who have scored more than Amy. Hence
100-19 = 81 (Amy's grade)
Number of candidates below Amy is 80.

Combining class of 80 and 100
72+80
------(100) will give 152*100/180
80+100

[spoiler]= 84.44444[/spoiler]

Ans is 85 :)

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:45 pm
siddhartha123 wrote:Dear all,

How to solve it ,

Amy's grade was the 90th percentile of the 80 grades for her class; of the 100 grades
from another class,19 were higher than amy's and rest were lower,if no other grade was same
as ammy's grade, then amy's was what percentile of the grades of two cases combined?

[spoiler]Ans: 85 th[/spoiler]
In Amy's class, the number of grades lower than Amy's = .9*80 = 72.
In the other class, since 19 of the 100 grades are higher than Amy's, the number of grades lower than Amy's = 100-19 = 81.
(Total lower than Amy's)/(Total grades) = (72+81)/(80+100) = 153/180 = 51/60 = 17/20 = 85/100 = 85%.

I posted an alternate approach here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/percentiles-t92226.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Bharath Krishnan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:42 pm
Oops. I was under the impression that the numerator that is to be considered as the grades lower than Amy should be a result after subtracting the higher grades from total grades; i.e 100-19=81. I chose 80 grades since it is lower than 81 and amy's grade is 81. (my understanding)

Thanks for clarifying this :)

Bharath-
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:52 am
Bharath Krishnan wrote:Oops. I was under the impression that the numerator that is to be considered as the grades lower than Amy should be a result after subtracting the higher grades from total grades; i.e 100-19=81. I chose 80 grades since it is lower than 81 and amy's grade is 81. (my understanding)

Thanks for clarifying this :)

Bharath-
Since Amy is not a member of the other class, her grade is not included among the 100 grades in the other class.
Of these 100 grades, 19 are higher than Amy's and 81 are lower.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion