BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Nice DS problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jasonc » Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:55 am
To answer the question, we need to have some idea of what x & y are.

1 is obviously insufficient so we can rule out a & d.

Looking that 2, we see that it also gives us no information about what x & y are, because we can put in a ton of different values for x, y and still get 89 (x=1 y=89, x=2 y=89/2... etc). This eliminates b.

So we're left with c & e.

Looking at both statements together, we see that if x & y are integers, the possible values for x & y while still having xy = 89 decreases to 1 set of distinct values IFF 89 is prime.

So the question becomes is 89 prime?
Yes it is, so we choose C as our answer.


Note, to find if a number is prime, do the following:
take the square root of 89, =~9.xxx (since 9 squared is 81 & 10 squared is 100). Now divide 89 by every prime number below 9.xx, which would be 2, 3, 5, 7. You'll see that 89 is not divisible by any of them and thus is prime. (I won't explain why this shows that 89 is prime, but can go into more details if you'd like)

EDIT:
forgot to mention that negative values for x/y won't matter since we're looking for x^10 +y^10
Join the discussion

by rajivmatta » Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:34 pm
I am not sure I fully comprehend

From second condition I get
89^10 + 1^10 or 9^10 + 9^10..which result in two different numbers..Therefore both conditions should be insufficient..
Join the discussion

by AleksandrM » Thu May 01, 2008 9:58 am
raji,

9 x 9 = 81, not 89. I am not sure where you are going with the second part?????

89 is a prime number. It looks like the product of 89 could only be a result of 89 x 1 = 89. However 178 x 1/2 is also 89. So I would agree that you need both statements in order to solve this one.
Join the discussion