BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Problem on mixtures

Expert replies
by kprabhala.mba » Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:46 pm
An alloy A has two materials in the ratio 1:2 and another alloy B has the same two materials in the ratio 2:3. How much content each of alloy A and alloy B should be mixed to produce another alloy that has the materials in the ratio 17:27?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 09, 2011 1:54 pm
kprabhala.mba wrote:An alloy A has two materials in the ratio 1:2 and another alloy B has the same two materials in the ratio 2:3. How much content each of alloy A and alloy B should be mixed to produce another alloy that has the materials in the ratio 17:27?
The following method is called alligation. It's an easy way to handle weighted average problems.

One of the materials constitutes 1/3 of Alloy A and 2/5 of Alloy B. This material must constitute 17/44 of the resulting mixture.

To combine a 1/3 mixture with a 2/5 mixture to get a combined mixture that is 17/44:

The proportion needed of each starting fraction is the positive difference between the other 2 fractions.

First, let's put all the fractions over a common denominator:

A = 1/3 = 220/660
B = 2/5 = 264/660
A+B = 17/44 = 255/660

Proportion needed of A = (264/660) - (255/660) = 9/660.
Proportion needed of B = (255/660) - (220/660) = 35/660

A:B = (9/660):(35/660) = 9:35.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by kprabhala.mba » Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:33 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
kprabhala.mba wrote:An alloy A has two materials in the ratio 1:2 and another alloy B has the same two materials in the ratio 2:3. How much content each of alloy A and alloy B should be mixed to produce another alloy that has the materials in the ratio 17:27?
The following method is called alligation. It's an easy way to handle weighted average problems.

One of the materials constitutes 1/3 of Alloy A and 2/5 of Alloy B. This material must constitute 17/44 of the resulting mixture.

To combine a 1/3 mixture with a 2/5 mixture to get a combined mixture that is 17/44:

The proportion needed of each starting fraction is the positive difference between the other 2 fractions.

First, let's put all the fractions over a common denominator:

A = 1/3 = 220/660
B = 2/5 = 264/660
A+B = 17/44 = 255/660

Proportion needed of A = (264/660) - (255/660) = 9/660.
Proportion needed of B = (255/660) - (220/660) = 35/660

A:B = (9/660):(35/660) = 9:35.
Thank you very much for the solution.

I solved it after forming these two equations as I was not aware of the alligation technique.

x/3 + 2y/5 = 17/44 and
2x/3 + 3y/5 = 27/44.

I too, therefore, got x:y as 9:35 but the answer given is 3:7.

Someone named 'stormier' sent me this solution by email (Thank you!):

"Lets add alloy A and alloy B in the ratio 1:x to produce the final material.

material m = 1 (from alloy A) + 2x (from alloy B) = 1+2x
material n = 2+3x

(1+2x)/(2+3x) = 17/27

=> x = 7/3

required ratio = 1:x =1:7/3 = 3:7"

Both the answers seem correct (the second one especially as it matches the book answer), but which one is the wrong one and why?
Join the discussion

by stormier » Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:49 pm
kprabhala.mba wrote:An alloy A has two materials in the ratio 1:2 and another alloy B has the same two materials in the ratio 2:3. How much content each of alloy A and alloy B should be mixed to produce another alloy that has the materials in the ratio 17:27?

Hi kprabhala, I retracted my solution because it was incorrect. Mitch's and your's are right.


Let's work both cases backwords.

Let's say we mix the two alloys in the ratio 3:7

3 (kg) of A contains -> 1 kg m + 2 kg n

7 (kg) of B contains -> 14/5 kg m + 21/5 kg n

Mixture contains -> (1+14/5) kg m : (2+21/5) kg n = 19/5:31/5 = 19/31 Incorrect.


Let's look at the 9:35 case

9:35

9 (kg) of A contains -> 3 kg m + 6 kg n

35 (kg) of B contains-> 14 kg m + 21 kg n

mixture contains -> (3+14) kg m : (6+21) kg n = 17:27 Correct.


Here's the flaw in the original 3:7 solution

I say that let the ratio of materials A: B be 1:x

In final mixture,

material m = 1/3 (from A) + 2x/5 (from B) [ In the wrong solution I wrote this as 1+2x, which is incorrect!)
material n = 2/3 + 3x/5

(1/3+2x/5)/(2/3+3x/5) = 17/27
=> x = 35/9

so answer = 1 to x = 1 to 35/9 = 9:35
Last edited by stormier on Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Join the discussion

by kprabhala.mba » Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:01 pm
stormier wrote:
kprabhala.mba wrote:An alloy A has two materials in the ratio 1:2 and another alloy B has the same two materials in the ratio 2:3. How much content each of alloy A and alloy B should be mixed to produce another alloy that has the materials in the ratio 17:27?

Hi kprabhala, I retracted my solution cause it was incorrect. Mitch's is right.


Let's work both cases backwords.

Let's say we mix the two alloys in the ratio 3:7

3 (kg) of A contains -> 1 kg m + 2 kg n

7 (kg) of B contains -> 14/5 kg m + 21/5 kg n

Mixture contains -> (1+14/5) kg m : (2+21/5) kg n = 19/5:31/5 = 19/31 Incorrect.


Let's look at the 9:35 case

9:35

9 (kg) of A contains -> 3 kg m + 6 kg n

35 (kg) of B contains-> 14 kg m + 21 kg n

mixture contains -> (3+14) kg m : (6+21) kg n = 17:27 Correct.
Thank you for clarifying the answers, stormier. The answer given in the text book is
apparently wrong!
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:16 pm
Here is the algebraic (and stormier's) approach :

Lets say the two materials are m1 and m2, and we mix k1 part of A and k2 part of B to produce the materials in the ratio 17:27. We want to find the ratio k1/k2 = z.

=> Part of m1/Part of m2 = 17/27
=> (k1/3 + 2k2/5)/(2k1/3 + 3k2/5) = 17/27
=> (5k1+6k2)/(10k1+9k2) = 17/27
=> (5z + 6) / (10z +9) = 17/27 (dividing the numerator and denominator by k2 and replacing k1/k2 by z, which we need to find)
=> 135 z + 162 = 170z + 153
=> z = 9/35.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by kprabhala.mba » Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:32 pm
The following method is called alligation. It's an easy way to handle weighted average problems.

The proportion needed of each starting fraction is the positive difference between the other 2 fractions.
Mitch, just curious how the alligation technique would work for more than 2 fractions.
e.g. 3 alloys with 3 materials in different proportions are mixed to form a compound alloy.
The equation method would definitely be tedious with multiple unknowns. I hope such questions
would not appear in GMAT as they are computationally intensive (and time-consuming)
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:27 am
kprabhala.mba wrote:
The following method is called alligation. It's an easy way to handle weighted average problems.

The proportion needed of each starting fraction is the positive difference between the other 2 fractions.
Mitch, just curious how the alligation technique would work for more than 2 fractions.
e.g. 3 alloys with 3 materials in different proportions are mixed to form a compound alloy.
The equation method would definitely be tedious with multiple unknowns. I hope such questions
would not appear in GMAT as they are computationally intensive (and time-consuming)
I wouldn't use alligation for a mixture that contains more than 2 elements. Most mixture problems can be solved easily by plugging in our own values or by plugging in the answer choices.

Here is a GMATPrep problem in which 3 different elements are combined. If you don't want to be exposed to the problem and its solution, please read no further.
Three grades of milk are 1%, 2%, 3% fat by volume. If x gallons of the 1% grade, y gallons of the 2% grade, and z gallons of the 3% grade are mixed to give x+y+z gallons of a 1.5 % grade, what is x in terms of y and z?

1) y+3z
2) (y+z)/4
3) 2y + 3z
4) 3y+z
5) 3y+4.5z
If we use 0 gallons of z, then equal amounts of x (1%) and y (2%) will yield a mixture that is 1.5% fat.

Plug in x=2, y=2, and z=0.
The question asks for the value of x=2. This is our target.
Now we plug y=2 and z=0 into all the answer choices to see which yields our target of 2.

Only answer choice A works:
y + 3z = 2 + 3*0 = 2.

The correct answer is A.

Here's an OG problem that can be solved easily by plugging in the answers:
Seed mixture X is 40 percent ryegrass and 60 percent bluegrass by weight; seed mixture Y is 25 percent ryegrass and 75 percent fescue. If a mixture of X and Y contains 30 percent ryegrass, what percent of the weight of this mixture is X?

(A) 10%
(B) 33.33 %
(C) 40%
(D) 50%
(E) 66.66 %
Answer choice C: Resulting mixture is 40% X
Let X=40, Y=60.
Ryegrass in X = .4*40 = 16.
Ryegrass in Y = .25*60 = 15.
Total ryegrass = 16+15 = 31.
Total ryegrass/Total mixture = 31/100 = 31%.
Since the resulting percentage of ryegrass must be just a bit smaller (30%), we need to use just a bit less of X (since it contains a smaller percentage of ryegrass than does Y).

The correct answer is B.

The problem above also could be solved by using alligation:

Proportion needed of X = 30-25 = 5.
Proportion needed of Y = 40-30 = 10.

Percentage of X in final mixture = 5/15 = 33.33%.

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion