Boldface - Candidates Running for Election

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
Thanked: 82 times
Followed by:9 members
GMAT Score:720

by maihuna » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:47 am
A stands out, there is no intermediate conclusion, only likely conclusion, both the parts well covered in Q1
Charged up again to beat the beast :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:31 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by gmatv09 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 11:50 am
IMO A

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 8 times

by riteshbindal » Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:36 pm
A IMO.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 393
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:18 pm
Location: Chicago
Thanked: 8 times

by riteshbindal » Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:40 pm
Sorry... Forgot to give the explanation:

A --> Correct. First bold part is just the information which says that every year blah blah happens. Second bold part says that "Someone will run for election" which is a conclusion.

B --> Incorrect. Second part is not the intermediate conclusion. It is the final conclusion.

C --> Incorrect. Where did the practice of journalists come from??? If someone chooses this as an answer, he is thinking too far. Out of scope.

D --> First bolded sentence is not an evidence. It is just a statement/information.

E --> Same as D.

Please let me know if I didn't specify anything correctly.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:56 pm
Option A looks good than other answers.