BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Mean and Mode

Expert replies
by anubhavgulati » Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:56 am
Hi,

Data Sufficiency Question.

Set of data consists of 3 integers.What is the Standard Deviation for this set of data ?
1) Average and Median are both 3.
2) Mode is 3.

Solution) I went for answer choice E (both are not sufficient), but when I cross checked answer was C(both statements together are sufficient).

As per statement 1, Its insufficient as sets can be {1,2,3} or {3,3,3}.
As per statement 2, As mode is 3, I think for the first set {1,2,3} we can also say mode is 1,2 or 3.
but as per the answer they have considered mode as 3 only for set {3,3,3}.

Can we say mode as 3 for the set {1,2,3}. This is where I get it wrong, but I have read that if set has unique elements, we can say that every element is a mode.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by beatthegmat.garry » Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:50 pm
Let n1, n2 and n3 be the 3 numbers:

statement 1: Mean=3 and Median=3

therefore,
(n1+n2+3)/3=3 .......n3=3.
n1+n2=6.
the possible combinations of n1 and n2 are (0,6)(1,5)(2,4)(3,3)

Statement 2:
Mode=3. Hence more than one number will be 3. Since n3 is assumed to be 3 we have either n1=n2=3.

Hence C.

Thanks !
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:59 am
Set of data consists of 3 integers.What is the Standard Deviation for this set of data ?
1) Average and Median are both 3.
2) Mode is 3.

from 1
the set can be 2,3,4 or 1,3,5 or 0,3,6 etc where average is 3 and median is 3. In-sufficient

from 2
the set can be 3,3,1 or 3,1,3 or 1,3,3 etc In-sufficient

from 1 and 2
the set should be 3,3,3. Sufficient!

Hope it helps!
Join the discussion

by anubhavgulati » Mon Aug 22, 2011 8:37 am
GmatKiss wrote:Set of data consists of 3 integers.What is the Standard Deviation for this set of data ?
1) Average and Median are both 3.
2) Mode is 3.

from 1
the set can be 2,3,4 or 1,3,5 or 0,3,6 etc where average is 3 and median is 3. In-sufficient

from 2
the set can be 3,3,1 or 3,1,3 or 1,3,3 etc In-sufficient

from 1 and 2
the set should be 3,3,3. Sufficient!

Hope it helps!
Appreciate your response, but still there is a doubt, let say if there are 3 unique elements in set, can we say that each element is mode.
If set is {1,2,3} can we say mode of this set is 1 or 2 or 3, as all occurs 1 time.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:24 am
anubhavgulati wrote: Appreciate your response, but still there is a doubt, let say if there are 3 unique elements in set, can we say that each element is mode.
If set is {1,2,3} can we say mode of this set is 1 or 2 or 3, as all occurs 1 time.
Good question, anubhavgulati.

The set {1, 2, 3} has three modes. They are 1, 2 and 3.

So, can we say that the mode of this set is 3? Not really, since "the" implies that there is one unique mode, and the set {1, 2, 3} has three modes.

Can we say that a mode of this set is 3? Sure. 3 is one of the three modes of the set {1, 2, 3}.

Now in the original question, statement 2 reads "Mode is 3"
Does this mean the mode is 3 or a mode is 3? It's unclear.

Given this ambiguity, we can't really answer the question. Also know that the GMAT would never be so ambiguous.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by anubhavgulati » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:32 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
anubhavgulati wrote: Appreciate your response, but still there is a doubt, let say if there are 3 unique elements in set, can we say that each element is mode.
If set is {1,2,3} can we say mode of this set is 1 or 2 or 3, as all occurs 1 time.
Good question, anubhavgulati.

The set {1, 2, 3} has three modes. They are 1, 2 and 3.

So, can we say that the mode of this set is 3? Not really, since "the" implies that there is one unique mode, and the set {1, 2, 3} has three modes.

Can we say that a mode of this set is 3? Sure. 3 is one of the three modes of the set {1, 2, 3}.

Now in the original question, statement 2 reads "Mode is 3"
Does this mean the mode is 3 or a mode is 3? It's unclear.

Given this ambiguity, we can't really answer the question. Also know that the GMAT would never be so ambiguous.

Cheers,
Brent
Ok, Thanks Brent for your solution.
Join the discussion