MGMAT RC - Leveraged

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:10 pm
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:2 members

MGMAT RC - Leveraged

by hja379 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:39 pm
In the early to mid-1980s, a business practice known as a "leveraged buyout" became popular as a method for companies to expand without having to spend any of their own assets. The leveraged buyout was not without its problems, however, and in time it came to represent in the public imagination not only corporate ingenuity and success, but also excess and greed. Many of the main corporate figures of the 1980s saw spectacular rises and, perhaps inevitably, spectacular falls as they abused the leveraged buyout as a means to extraordinary financial gain.

A leveraged buyout entails one company purchasing another using the assets of the purchased company as the collateral to secure the funds needed to buy that company. The leveraged buyout allows companies to take on debt that their own assets would have been insufficient to secure in order to finance expansion. The benefit of the leveraged buyout is obvious: companies with insufficient funds can still expand to compete with larger competitors. The drawbacks, however, became apparent only after the fact: the purchased company must perform extraordinarily well in order to generate the capital to pay off the loans that made the purchase possible in the first place. When the purchased company underperforms, the buyer must somehow find the money to pay off the loans. If such funds are not obtained, the buyer may be forced to sell off the company, or parts thereof, for less than the purchase price. In these cases, the buyer is still responsible for repaying the debt that is not covered by the sale price. Many of these deals resulted in the evisceration of the purchased companies, as subparts were sold to pay down the loans and employees were laid off to reduce costs and increase profits.

The most famous leveraged buyout is probably the 1988 purchase of RJR Nabisco by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts ("KKR"). The purchase price for the corporate giant RJR Nabisco was $25 billion, almost all of which was borrowed money. The takeover was "hostile," meaning that RJR Nabisco resisted any overtures from potential buyers. KKR ultimately succeeded by buying a controlling interest in RJR Nabisco, thereby obtaining voting control over the company. By the mid-1990s, though, KKR had seen a reversal of fortune and was forced to sell off RJR Nabisco in order to relieve itself of the crushing debt load.

The 1980s were the heyday of the leveraged buyout, as lending institutions were willing to loan money for these ventures. When the deals turned out to be much riskier in life than on paper, the lenders turned away from the buyouts and returned to the notion that borrowers must possess adequate collateral of their own.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies
B) challenge a common perception of financiers
C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device
D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period
E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health

OA C

I am not convinced why it is the right answer. There is no mention in the passage that 'leveraged buyout' evolved into something. It was popular at one point, but when companies miserably failed to sustain themselves after buying other companies even though they did not have enough collateral, the 'buyout' procedure mentioned stopped being the most popular one. Thus lost the support of the lending institutions.

2. The author mentions the RJR Nabisco case most probably in order to emphasize which of the following points?

A) Many lending institutions are no longer willing to support leveraged buyouts.
B) Leveraged buyouts can be successfully utilized to purchase large companies.
C) Leveraged buyouts are generally less successful in hostile takeovers than in non-hostile takeovers.
D) Leveraged buyouts contain major risks in addition to their benefits.
E) Kohlberg Kravis Roberts was a leader in the development of the leveraged buyout.

OA D

Your input would be much appreciated.
Last edited by hja379 on Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:26 pm
Location: New York City
Thanked: 68 times
Followed by:37 members
GMAT Score:780

by Adam@Knewton » Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:11 pm
First, the main idea question:
hja379 wrote:1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A) criticize the motives of those who use risky financial strategies
B) challenge a common perception of financiers
C) describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device
D) explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period
E) argue that leveraged buyouts are detrimental to overall financial health
My prephrase was "trace the rise and fall of the leveraged buyout as a popular maneuver, and point out its strengths and especially its flaws." A nice neutral passage that picks on the LB without truly criticizing it, and is mostly focused on how it started and then fell out of favor. (C) matched my prediction.

Your comment that "evolution" isn't the best word is well-taken -- but RC lends itself to having mediocre word choice in the right answers. Otherwise it would simply be too easy, too straightforward. If we interpret "evolution" in the broadest sense, it really just means "changed over time" -- and it did change, from popular to less-popular, over the course of this passage. No, it's not the ideal word, but it's not Wrong, so we have to allow it. Try not to nitpick over word choice. Instead, nitpick for 2 reasons: 1) scope and 2) tone. Look at how this works here:

(A) "motives" -- wrong in scope; "criticize" -- wrong in tone
(B) "perception of financiers" -- wrong in scope; "challenge" -- wrong in tone
(C) "evolution and application" -- acceptable in scope; "describe" -- correct in tone
(D) "popularity" -- right in scope, but not for the whole passage; "explain" -- acceptable in tone
(E) "overall financial health" -- wrong in scope; "argue ... detrimental" -- wrong in tone.

***

In terms of the next question, I'm a little confused.
hja379 wrote:2. The author mentions the RJR Nabisco case most probably in order to emphasize which of the following points?

A) Many lending institutions are no longer willing to support leveraged buyouts.
B) Leveraged buyouts can be successfully utilized to purchase large companies.
C) Leveraged buyouts are generally less successful in hostile takeovers than in non-hostile takeovers.
D) Leveraged buyouts contain major risks in addition to their benefits.
E) Kohlberg Kravis Roberts was a leader in the development of the leveraged buyout.
You list the OA as B, but include this line from MGMAT:
hja379 wrote: MGMAT's explanation:
This may be true (and presumably some companies did use LBOs successfully), but the RJR Nabisco case is an example of a failed LBO, not a successful one
This sounds to me like an argument AGAINST choice B -- because the purpose of the passage is not to discuss the success. B could be right for an Inference Question, because it is something we can Infer from the example, but this is an "in order to" question, a Function question, and thus B seems wrong to me, as well. What choice did you go with? I was comfortable with D, which seems to express one of the main ideas of the passage, always the best first prephrase for a Function question.

Are you sure the OA is B? Again, that explanation you included seems to be working against it, so I'm a bit confused.
Prep Smarter, Score Higher
www.knewton.com

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:10 pm
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:2 members

by hja379 » Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:06 pm
This sounds to me like an argument AGAINST choice B -- because the purpose of the passage is not to discuss the success. B could be right for an Inference Question, because it is something we can Infer from the example, but this is an "in order to" question, a Function question, and thus B seems wrong to me, as well. What choice did you go with? I was comfortable with D, which seems to express one of the main ideas of the passage, always the best first prephrase for a Function question.

Are you sure the OA is B? Again, that explanation you included seems to be working against it, so I'm a bit confused.
My apologies. I edited the post to reflect the right answer choice. Again, sorry for the confusion.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:10 pm
Thanked: 20 times
Followed by:2 members

by hja379 » Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:09 pm
Your comment that "evolution" isn't the best word is well-taken -- but RC lends itself to having mediocre word choice in the right answers. Otherwise it would simply be too easy, too straightforward. If we interpret "evolution" in the broadest sense, it really just means "changed over time" -- and it did change, from popular to less-popular, over the course of this passage. No, it's not the ideal word, but it's not Wrong, so we have to allow it. Try not to nitpick over word choice. Instead, nitpick for 2 reasons: 1) scope and 2) tone. Look at how this works here:

(A) "motives" -- wrong in scope; "criticize" -- wrong in tone
(B) "perception of financiers" -- wrong in scope; "challenge" -- wrong in tone
(C) "evolution and application" -- acceptable in scope; "describe" -- correct in tone
(D) "popularity" -- right in scope, but not for the whole passage; "explain" -- acceptable in tone
(E) "overall financial health" -- wrong in scope; "argue ... detrimental" -- wrong in tone.
Adam,

Thanks so much for that explanation and it was spot on and it completely makes sense now.

[/quote]

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:53 am

by bgs4gmat » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:04 am
The primary Q from this passage shows that why one must focus as mush as possible on Official Q's.
I am not convinced by the explanation here and also at the MGMAT Forum:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/in- ... t9953.html

My Summary of the passage:
Para 1: Popularity of leveraged buyouts in 80s and its negative aspects
Para 2: Details about "How leveraged buyouts work in practice" and its limitations in detail
Para 3: Example of a failed leveraged buyouts
Para 4: Again talk about leveraged buyouts in 80s that 80s were good for leveraged buyouts and that reasons why it faded into oblivion

So i don't understand why the correct answer is "describe the evolution and application of a certain financial device". The passage talk about only 80s. Only place where passage talks about 90s is in the example paragraph. All the instructor (even MGMAT's own Ron in his August 19, 2010:
Reading Comprehension: Long Passages & Main Idea Questions session said the same) says that don't go for example and content/facts related data while solving Main Point Q.

So i am not convinced why choice D "explain the popularity of leveraged buyouts during a certain period" is wrong?