BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Math!

Expert replies
by bluestocking » Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:13 pm
My experience with the GMAT tells me that the questions on the quant section are NOT of an exceptionally tough variety - just the very SMART variety.

One must, MUST (I cannot emphasis this enough) R E A D the question properly.

Something I need to learn myself (mum's voice going 'haste makes waste' is playing in my head right now!) - Towards this end I would like to start a new thread - problems that may or may not be very tough = but require understanding (and remembering while solving) the question properly.

Lets start the series with :

PS - 1

Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) nx – n < 0

(2) x–1 = –2


(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) alone is not.
(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) alone is not.
(C) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.
(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question.
(E) Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question.

(picked from MahattanGMAT)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by thankont » Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:25 am
I agree with your approach..
I think ans. is --E--
|n|<1 => -1<n<1 (this is what we are looking for
Now 1) nx-n<0 => n(x-1)<0 so either n>0 and x<1 or n<0 and x>1
(A does not hold, take for example. n=3 x=-2)
2) x-1=-2 so x=-1 (this does not say anything about n so B does not hold)
combining both statements we just get n>0 (which does not hold for ex. n=2
so I put --E--
Last edited by thankont on Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

welcome!

by bluestocking » Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:09 am
hiya!

good effort, though thats not the correct ans

would you like to give it another shot before I put up the correct ans?

hint : consider + / - values for everything - including the indice (just re read the question stem - it seems like it didn't copy paste correctly and I lost the original formatting)

It should read :


Question:


Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) n^x – n < 0
(n raised to the power of x) - n < 0

(2) x^–1 = –2
(x raised to the power of -1) = -2

Hope you are able to solve it this time.
Join the discussion

Re: welcome!

by aim-wsc » Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:06 pm
Great efforts girl :)
Nice initiative.

OK now that the question is changed altogether
Anybody want to try it one more time?


bytheway with earlier question @ post #1 thanktont's reasonings are correct. the answer should be E for that.
bluestocking wrote:
Question:


Is |n| < 1 ?

(1) n^x – n < 0
(n raised to the power of x) - n < 0

(2) x^–1 = –2
(x raised to the power of -1) = -2

Hope you are able to solve it this time.

PS:
Dear Pramila,
I am thinking of arranging an offline meet at Mumbai click here to know more
Join the discussion

by thankont » Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:23 am
I am not sure here but from n^x<n we see that it holds only when
0<n<1 and when x>1
from b we have that x=-1/2 so statement never holds (combining both)
so I would say --c--
Join the discussion

by axefx » Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:56 pm
thankont wrote:I am not sure here but from n^x<n we see that it holds only when
0<n<1 and when x>1
from b we have that x=-1/2 so statement never holds (combining both)
so I would say --c--
Would you mind explaining this:
"n^x<n we see that it holds only when
0<n<1 and when x>1 "
Join the discussion