Amphibian Population- UV-B radiations

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

Amphibian Population- UV-B radiations

by kanha81 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:00 pm
Amphibian populations are declining in numbers
worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone
layer has been continuously depleted throughout the
last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a
type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously
produced by the sun, and which can damage genes.
Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to
shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B
radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the
protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the
primary cause of the declining amphibian population
is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the
argument EXCEPT:

(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by
atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type
that can damage genes.

(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more
rapidly than are the populations of
nonamphibian species whose tissues and
eggs have more natural protection from
UV-B.

(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly
depleted above all the areas of the world in
which amphibian populations are declining.

(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not
become smaller over the past century.

(E) Amphibian populations have declined
continuously for the last 50 years.

Please explain with answers.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:28 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:780

by relic » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:09 pm
The task of this question is to strengthen the argument that the depletion of the ozone has caused the shrinking frog population. The EXCEPT means that four answers will be strengthening ideas, but the correct answer will be something else.

Answer A is irrelevant-- the number of types of radiation that cause gene damage doesn't affect the argument. Thus, this choice is correct.

But I would guess Answer D is a tough one to avoid. However, it does strengthen the argument by rejecting another cause of the declining frog population. Sometimes a strengthening answer will do this, particularly on an argument of cause and effect.
Relic Tutoring

Free GMAT advice and strategies at https://relictutoring.blocked/

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

Re: Amphibian Population- UV-B radiations

by rahulg83 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:01 pm
kanha81 wrote:Amphibian populations are declining in numbers
worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone
layer has been continuously depleted throughout the
last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a
type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously
produced by the sun, and which can damage genes.
Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to
shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B
radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the
protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the
primary cause of the declining amphibian population
is the depletion of the ozone layer.

Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the
argument EXCEPT:

(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by
atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type
that can damage genes.

(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more
rapidly than are the populations of
nonamphibian species whose tissues and
eggs have more natural protection from
UV-B.

(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly
depleted above all the areas of the world in
which amphibian populations are declining.

(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not
become smaller over the past century.

(E) Amphibian populations have declined
continuously for the last 50 years.

Please explain with answers.
the options A,B,C and E suggest that amphibian population is declining due to depletion of ozone layer. Option D says that natural habitat has the same size as was 50 years ago, but this is not at all related anywhere with depletion in ozone layer. It neither strengthen nor weaken the conclusion..

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:50 am
Thanked: 1 times

by yashanth.ponnanna » Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:32 am
I would go with "D" because it is irrelevant to the topic. It neither strengthens or weakens the conclusion.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 431
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by kanha81 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:21 am
relic wrote:The task of this question is to strengthen the argument that the depletion of the ozone has caused the shrinking frog population. The EXCEPT means that four answers will be strengthening ideas, but the correct answer will be something else.

Answer A is irrelevant-- the number of types of radiation that cause gene damage doesn't affect the argument. Thus, this choice is correct.

But I would guess Answer D is a tough one to avoid. However, it does strengthen the argument by rejecting another cause of the declining frog population. Sometimes a strengthening answer will do this, particularly on an argument of cause and effect.
OA is [spoiler][A][/spoiler].
You're absolutely correct about both the points. [spoiler][D][/spoiler] is tough choice not to choose, while [spoiler][A][/spoiler] does not add any value to the argument.
Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:00 am

by samanthaJ79 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:59 am
I will go with option D