BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Evaluate the argument

Expert replies
by champmag » Tue May 03, 2011 9:01 pm
Choi: All other factors being equal, children whose parents earned doctorates are ,more likely to earn
a doctorate than children whose parents did not earn doctorates.

Hart:But Consider This: Over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a parent that also hold a doctorate.


Which of the following is the most accurate evaluation of Hart's reply

1.) It establishes that Choi's cliam is an exaggeration.

2.) If true, it effectively demostrates that Choi's claim cannot be accurate.

3.) It is consistent with Choi's claim.

4.) It provides alternate reasons to accept Choi's claim.

5.) It mistakes what is necessary for an event with what is sufficient to determine that an event will occur
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Tue May 03, 2011 9:27 pm
IMO 2
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Wed May 04, 2011 1:01 am
Its a tricky question

watch out this link

https://www.beatthegmat.com/good-one-t57232.html
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Wed May 04, 2011 5:58 am
Hi Atul,

In this I have a query that Hart says: But Consider This: Over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a parent that also hold a doctorate.............in this it can also be the case that the parent is no more in the world ..............can we take this aspect also in consideration while dealing with this question??????
Join the discussion

by LIL » Wed May 04, 2011 6:10 am
aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Atul,

In this I have a query that Hart says: But Consider This: Over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a parent that also hold a doctorate.............in this it can also be the case that the parent is no more in the world ..............can we take this aspect also in consideration while dealing with this question??????
hmm. i'm pretty sure that unless the problem says something specifically out of the ordinary (e.g. "over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a living parent that also holds a doctorate"), you are expected to exercise a certain amount of "common sense." in other words, don't read too much into the problem.

for example, if a problem says "he dropped the apple," common sense says (a) he is on earth and (b) the apple fell to the ground, as apples are wont to do on this planet. an out-of-the-ordinary assumption would be to assume that "he" was john glenn and he was in a space shuttle when he dropped the apple. unless the gmat specifically tells you "john glenn dropped the apple in the middle of the international space station," there is no reason to make this assumption.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Wed May 04, 2011 6:11 am
aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Atul,

In this I have a query that Hart says: But Consider This: Over 70 percent of all doctorate holders do not have a parent that also hold a doctorate.............in this it can also be the case that the parent is no more in the world ..............can we take this aspect also in consideration while dealing with this question??????
Sorry bro, i don't think that gonna be a consideration as the argument is not concerned that the parents are alive or dead....argument only concerns whether parents earned doctorate or not in past...doesn't matter they are alive or dead..
Join the discussion

by champmag » Mon May 09, 2011 2:51 am
The answer lies in the keyword "more likely"

OA:C
Join the discussion