BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 12 - 16

Expert replies
by vineetbatra » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:42 pm
Retail sales rose 0.8 of 1 percent in August,intensifying expectations that personal spending in the July-September quarter more than doubled that of the 1.4 percent growth rate in personal spending for the previous quarter.

(A) that personal spending in the July-September quarter more than doubled that of

(B) that personal spending in the July-September quarter would more than double

(C) of personal spending in the July-September quarter, that it more than doubled

(D) of personal spending in the July-Septemberquarter more than doubling that of

(E) of personal spending in the July-September quarter, that it would more than double that of

In B i find one problem.

the sentence says "that personal spending in the July-September quarter would more than double"

here the comparison is between personal spending and the 1.4 percent growth rate. This seems incorrect to me.

Also in E is the usage of it correct. The OG does not mention anything about it.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by frank1 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:11 pm
Considering all the factor i will still go with B
(B seems better than other,even tense seems ok)
Join the discussion

by arpita@gurome » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:16 pm
Since the sentence talks of an expectation and indicates a projected figure, "would more than double" is the correct usage. Note that the comparison is not between "personal spending" and 1.4 percent growth rate. Personal spending in the July-Sept quarter is still being compared with the personal spending in the previous quarter.

The usage of "it" in (E), as your rightly mention, is incorrect. The additional clause "that it would more than double", makes the sentence awkward.
Arpita Sen
Verbal and Admissions Expert
Gurome, Inc.
www.GuroMe.com
Win a free MBA essay review: https://bit.ly/toZumc

1-800-566-4043
+91 99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:06 pm
in one question similar to this...i think they tricked me...
as i opted for ....ing parallelism (if that was true answer would have been D lo)
intensifying ....doubling

but we have different main verb so ....

any way gets tricky sometime....
Join the discussion

by vineetbatra » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:19 pm
Thanks for the response Arpita, but I am still confused how personal spending in the July-September quarter compare with the personal spending of previous quarter

here the sentence says "x (Personal spending) in A (the July-September quarter) - would more than Double y (1.4 % growth rate) in B (personal spending for the previous quarter).

The parallelism seems all whacky...

Vineet
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1