Influenza virus

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

Influenza virus

by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 10:43 am
A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Thu May 28, 2009 11:52 am
would go for D

conc: every year it would be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus

A. doesnt affect the argument

B. out of scope

C. doesnt affect the argument

D. correct IMO. negate: each year most prevalent virus is the one that had been prevalent before-same strain of virus-high risk individuals would not need to be vaccinated. argument falls apart.


E. side-effect is out of scope

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 12:41 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tdadic84 » Thu May 28, 2009 1:02 pm
IMO C....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:41 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by ankit1383 » Thu May 28, 2009 4:36 pm
IMO.......D

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Thu May 28, 2009 6:14 pm
Answer should be 'C'. Here is my reasoning, each year all the high risk individuals have to be vaccinated for the virus because each year vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year...

If we see the opposite of option 'C' -

vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.

then argument becomes invalid.

OA please.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 6:43 pm
I would go for C.
If a vaccine prevents more than one strain of virus, there will not be a need to vaccinate individulas every year.

OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Indy
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Influenza virus

by amazonviper » Thu May 28, 2009 7:24 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
IMO C . Because it clearly states in the passage that every year vaccination is necessary for a different strain of the virus. D cuts close too but I choose C. OA please.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am
Thanked: 9 times

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:24 am
scoobydooby wrote:would go for D
D. correct IMO. negate: each year most prevalent virus is the one that had been prevalent before-same strain of virus-high risk individuals would not need to be vaccinated. argument falls apart.
well done. OA is certainly D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 12:55 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: Influenza virus

by vinaynp » Fri May 29, 2009 2:21 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
My vote goes for D)

Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by ssgmatter » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:09 am
can anyone please explain this one in more details by giving reason why each of the option is wrong and the one that is correct ....

Regards,
Phil

Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:3 members

by ssgmatter » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:16 pm
I would request the experts to please explain this toughie...

Regards,
Phil

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by Phirozz » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:08 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year's vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year's vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Each year's vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Why is it necessary to receive vaccine every year, because a new strain of influenza virus likely to accur every year. This is what the assumption mentioned in ption D.

option C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus. Has it anything to do with conclusion ie vaccine is needed every year ??? Answer is obviously NO, so its not the assumption.

Legendary Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:33 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:2 members

by kstv » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:15 am
A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
Nothing to suggest the population of high risk is stable.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
Then vaccination would be undertaken seeing the virulence of the strain.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
Premise cannot be a fact.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
If it was not, the vaccine of last year must have helped to strengthen the resistence to the particular strain.
(E) Each year's vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Out of scope.
IMO D.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:53 pm
Followed by:1 members

by gmat800_ » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:16 am
IMO C

OA?

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:53 pm
Followed by:1 members

by gmat800_ » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:35 am
Afyer reviewing the options I change my opinion,,... IMO D

OA=???