BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Influenza virus

Expert replies
by avenus » Thu May 28, 2009 10:43 am
A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Thu May 28, 2009 11:52 am
would go for D

conc: every year it would be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus

A. doesnt affect the argument

B. out of scope

C. doesnt affect the argument

D. correct IMO. negate: each year most prevalent virus is the one that had been prevalent before-same strain of virus-high risk individuals would not need to be vaccinated. argument falls apart.


E. side-effect is out of scope
Join the discussion

by tdadic84 » Thu May 28, 2009 1:02 pm
IMO C....
Join the discussion

by ankit1383 » Thu May 28, 2009 4:36 pm
IMO.......D
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu May 28, 2009 6:14 pm
Answer should be 'C'. Here is my reasoning, each year all the high risk individuals have to be vaccinated for the virus because each year vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year...

If we see the opposite of option 'C' -

vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.

then argument becomes invalid.

OA please.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Thu May 28, 2009 6:43 pm
I would go for C.
If a vaccine prevents more than one strain of virus, there will not be a need to vaccinate individulas every year.

OA?
Join the discussion

Re: Influenza virus

by amazonviper » Thu May 28, 2009 7:24 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
IMO C . Because it clearly states in the passage that every year vaccination is necessary for a different strain of the virus. D cuts close too but I choose C. OA please.
Join the discussion

by avenus » Fri May 29, 2009 8:24 am
scoobydooby wrote:would go for D
D. correct IMO. negate: each year most prevalent virus is the one that had been prevalent before-same strain of virus-high risk individuals would not need to be vaccinated. argument falls apart.
well done. OA is certainly D
Join the discussion

Re: Influenza virus

by vinaynp » Fri May 29, 2009 2:21 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year’s vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
My vote goes for D)
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:09 am
can anyone please explain this one in more details by giving reason why each of the option is wrong and the one that is correct ....

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:16 pm
I would request the experts to please explain this toughie...

Regards,
Phil
Join the discussion

by Phirozz » Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:08 pm
avenus wrote:A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year's vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
(A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
(E) Each year's vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Each year's vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Why is it necessary to receive vaccine every year, because a new strain of influenza virus likely to accur every year. This is what the assumption mentioned in ption D.

option C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus. Has it anything to do with conclusion ie vaccine is needed every year ??? Answer is obviously NO, so its not the assumption.
Join the discussion

by kstv » Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:15 am
A) The number of individuals in the high-risk group for influenza will not significantly change from year to year.
Nothing to suggest the population of high risk is stable.
(B) The likelihood that a serious influenza epidemic will occur varies from year to year.
Then vaccination would be undertaken seeing the virulence of the strain.
(C) No vaccine for the influenza virus protects against more than one strain of that virus.
Premise cannot be a fact.
(D) Each year the strain of influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent will be one that had not previously been deemed most likely to be prevalent.
If it was not, the vaccine of last year must have helped to strengthen the resistence to the particular strain.
(E) Each year's vaccine will have fewer side effects than the vaccine of the previous year since the technology for making vaccines will constantly improve
Out of scope.
IMO D.
Join the discussion

by gmat800_ » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:16 am
IMO C

OA?
Join the discussion

by gmat800_ » Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:35 am
Afyer reviewing the options I change my opinion,,... IMO D

OA=???
Join the discussion