this is legitimate, because "14,000" is a noun.vk_vinayak wrote:=When Duma deputy Gennady Gudkov left Pushkin Square Monday night, the crowd -- estimated by the police at 14,000 -- was just starting to disperse.
there's also this sentence from gmat prep. (the following is the non-underlined part, so there's no question about its legitimacy.)
With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, ...
again, "degrees Fahrenheit" is a noun, so this is all dandy.
--
regarding "estimated at" vs "estimated to be":
* "estimated at" can be followed by nouns, as in the examples above.
* "estimated to be" is generally legitimate when you could normally use a verb that is a form of "to be".
for instance, you can write I think that these ruins are 14,000 years old; note that "are" is a form of "to be".
therefore, the ruins were estimated to be 14,000 years old is also legitimate -- it's just another form of the same construction. in other words, "estimated to be" is not some special idiom.












