Am I right or is the wording on this question total horse sh%$? "INCLUDING"??? When I read that I was like what the heck??
In a certain apartment complex, 1/4 of the apartments have terraces. If 1/8 of the apartments have skylights, of which 1/5 of those have terraces. what fraction of the apartments have neither terraces nor skylights?
I should file a law suit against Princeton Review for such a terribly worded question. The same should go for ETS. The math portion of the Quant on the GMAT is not a math exam, it is an English exam. ETS contrived the exam this way because had it been a minimally worded exam, with just straight math proof/solving questions, Indian and Chinese students would continually crush US students in this exam and take all the admission. Subversive racism.
"INCLUDING"??"INCLUDING"?? Doesn't that mean "In addition" to the "1/8 of the apartments that have skylights"? So 1/8(# of Apartments)+1/5(# of Terraces). This F*ed up Yo, veiled racism. I am guesing question 31 of the GMAT requires the exam taker to hold his hand to the screen to determine if it is the appropriate right shade to receiving a high score?