not sure about the answer of a question from OG12

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:50 pm
OG12-30

For members of the seventeenth century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.

A) a method to protect
B) as a method protecting
C) protecting
D) as a protection of
E) to protect

OA C

Please explain why "to protect" can't be the answer.
Thanks~
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:9 members

by Gowri@CrackVerbal » Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:17 am
To-verb: This is the short form of 'in order to' and is used to convey an intent or purpose. For example,
I practiced for nine hours every day to make my moves perfect. <correct>
What was my purpose? To make my moves perfect.
Note that the presence of a comma before 'to' is unnecessary and therefore, incorrect.

Verb-ing: This is used when no intent/purpose is to be conveyed.

In your question, the objective/purpose behind the use of animal-hide shields is not relevant. Therefore, the use of 'to protect' is incorrect.
Gowri N Kishore
Verbal Specialist & Mentor
CrackVerbal

If you find my posts useful, please hit the 'Thank' button. :)

Get a FREE Profile Evaluation from CrackVerbal experts!
https://applications.crackverbal.com/fre ... valuation/

Attend Live, Instructor-led Online classes by 99th p'cile instructors!
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/gmat-course ... ve-course/

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:50 pm

by pincessGMAT » Tue Jul 02, 2013 3:10 am
Gowri@CrackVerbal wrote:To-verb: This is the short form of 'in order to' and is used to convey an intent or purpose. For example,
I practiced for nine hours every day to make my moves perfect. <correct>
What was my purpose? To make my moves perfect.
Note that the presence of a comma before 'to' is unnecessary and therefore, incorrect.

Verb-ing: This is used when no intent/purpose is to be conveyed.

In your question, the objective/purpose behind the use of animal-hide shields is not relevant. Therefore, the use of 'to protect' is incorrect.
Hi Gowri,
Thanks for the reply!
But what do you mean by saying "In your question, the objective/purpose behind the use of animal-hide shields is not relevant."? Please explain.
Also, I "think" , protecting should be derived from , which are protecting while the which points shields. If that is so, then why can't the same concept be applied to "to protect?"

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:34 am
Location: Bengaluru, India
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:9 members

by Gowri@CrackVerbal » Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:34 am
Let's simplify the sentence and look at option E.
Animal-hide shields were essential military items, to protect warriors.
This is incorrect.

You cannot use an infinitive after the comma unless the sentence were to be rewritten this way:

Animal-hide shields were essential military items, designed to protect warriors.
Animal-hide shields were essential military items, made to protect warriors.
Gowri N Kishore
Verbal Specialist & Mentor
CrackVerbal

If you find my posts useful, please hit the 'Thank' button. :)

Get a FREE Profile Evaluation from CrackVerbal experts!
https://applications.crackverbal.com/fre ... valuation/

Attend Live, Instructor-led Online classes by 99th p'cile instructors!
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/gmat-course ... ve-course/

• Page 1 of 1