The basic assumption of organizational theory

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members
The basic assumption of organizational theory that rationality requires both workers and management to work for the greater benefit of the firm is severely flawed for several reasons. A classic argument of organizational theory posits that workers in a plant which produces watches would be interested in producing as many watches as possible in the least amount of time because increased productivity would mean higher profits which would then mean, in the long run, higher wages. However, this argument exhibits several serious errors. First, it presumes that higher profits will automatically lead to higher wages. History has shown that this is the case only following struggles between management and workers and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration. Second, proponents of this argument presume that since management assumes that there is a connection between profits and wages, the workers also share the same assumption. And yet, workers often base their demands for higher wages on their idea of a livable income rather than the profits of the firm. Third, organizational theory falsely assumes that workers will always aim to increase their individual incomes. In reality, they may prefer fewer working hours, a more relaxed work pace and higher availability of jobs in their community rather than maximizing their own individual incomes.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the author's theory about the connection between profits and wages?

A) According to a recent study, workers are more likely to strike in demand for higher wages in economies with declining profit rates and higher prices.

B) When the cost of living rises, management will increase wages accordingly.

C) According to opinion polls, a large majority of workers would agree to a pay cut to stop their firm from going bankrupt.

D) In industry X, management cut wages by 20% even after profits increased by the same amount.

E) When the cost of living rises, fewer wage struggles occur in firms with higher profit rates.

Pls explain your pick.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:11 am
Thanked: 2 times

by sai.99.gmat » Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:01 pm
My pick would be (A) According to a recent study, workers are more likely to strike in demand for higher wages in economies with declining profit rates and higher prices.



Based on the excerpt from the passage -: "And yet, workers often base their demands for higher wages on their idea of a livable income rather than the profits of the firm".

Workers may likely demand for higher wages in economies with 'high prices' importantly...

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:59 pm
sai.99.gmat wrote:My pick would be (A) According to a recent study, workers are more likely to strike in demand for higher wages in economies with declining profit rates and higher prices.



Based on the excerpt from the passage -: "And yet, workers often base their demands for higher wages on their idea of a livable income rather than the profits of the firm".

Workers may likely demand for higher wages in economies with 'high prices' importantly...

First, it presumes that higher profits will automatically lead to higher wages. History has shown that this is the case only following struggles between management and workers and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration. Second, proponents of this argument presume that since management assumes that there is a connection between profits and wages, the workers also share the same assumption.

Both the first and second has elements that show connection btn profits and wages. Do you agree?

The one of the supporing fact author gives for first is "and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration" - don't you think D is linked with this?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:23 pm
patanjali.purpose wrote:First, it presumes that higher profits will automatically lead to higher wages. History has shown that this is the case only following struggles between management and workers and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration. Second, proponents of this argument presume that since management assumes that there is a connection between profits and wages, the workers also share the same assumption.

Both the first and second has elements that show connection btn profits and wages. Do you agree?

The one of the supporing fact author gives for first is "and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration" - don't you think D is linked with this?

these are not author's point - these are the point author is negating.

However, this argument exhibits several serious errors.
1. higher profit ----> higher wages : this is what the author is negating
author's point : this holds true only when there is a struggle between management and workers
2. management's assumption : profits ----> wages and workers also share the same assumption
author's stand : workers demand for higher wages depends on livable income rather than profits of the firm

The passage proceed here in this way :

- a generalization ---- > author's stand - negating that generalization


D - is a weakener of the author's point : as it supports the concept that link profit to wages.

B - the rational decision that the author reject is supported here - eliminated

C - this completely weakens the second point.

E - for this we have to combine both :
higher livable income ---- > struggle for higher salary.
here :
higher livable income ---- > no struggle for higher salary, so we can conclude that
higher profit firms -----> pay higher salary

A - this supports both 1 and 2.

IMO : A

What is the OA ?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:11 am
Thanked: 2 times

by sai.99.gmat » Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:44 am
patanjali.purpose wrote:
sai.99.gmat wrote:My pick would be (A) According to a recent study, workers are more likely to strike in demand for higher wages in economies with declining profit rates and higher prices.



Based on the excerpt from the passage -: "And yet, workers often base their demands for higher wages on their idea of a livable income rather than the profits of the firm".

Workers may likely demand for higher wages in economies with 'high prices' importantly...

First, it presumes that higher profits will automatically lead to higher wages. History has shown that this is the case only following struggles between management and workers and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration. Second, proponents of this argument presume that since management assumes that there is a connection between profits and wages, the workers also share the same assumption.

Both the first and second has elements that show connection btn profits and wages. Do you agree?

The one of the supporing fact author gives for first is "and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration" - don't you think D is linked with this?

Option D is too specific about wage cuts...which I dont see listed on the passage, and the connection between profits and wages has been listed, but specifically from Management, but they havent listed about wage cuts per-se if they dont meet profits..


And well option A is right in sync...

I agree with Avik on this

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:26 pm
avik.ch wrote:these are not author's point - these are the point author is negating.

However, this argument exhibits several serious errors.
1. higher profit ----> higher wages : this is what the author is negating
author's point : this holds true only when there is a struggle between management and workers


Agree. In addition to this, there is another point (of author) 'does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration'
2. management's assumption : profits ----> wages and workers also share the same assumption
author's stand : workers demand for higher wages depends on livable income rather than profits of the firm
D - is a weakener of the author's point : as it supports the concept that link profit to wages.
A - this supports both 1 and 2. IMO : A
How do you think D supports the link btn profits and wages? Profits increased but wages dropped. In my view, D supports the 2nd thought of First assumption (ie point mentioned in RED above)

A - how do you think it support point 2 (workers demand for higher wages depends on livable income rather than profits of the firm). Option says' workers likely to strike with declining profits and higher profits - note passage says 'depends on livable income while option says likely to strike with declining profits that means wages are linked with profits (up/down does not matter).

Pls share your thoughts.

OA - A. It will be great if you can help identify my reasoning error

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
Thanked: 149 times
Followed by:32 members
GMAT Score:760

by avik.ch » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:27 pm
patanjali.purpose wrote: Agree. In addition to this, there is another point (of author) 'does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration'
Yes, I missed it.
patanjali.purpose wrote:2. management's assumption : profits ----> wages and workers also share the same assumption
author's stand : workers demand for higher wages depends on livable income rather than profits of the firm
D - is a weakener of the author's point : as it supports the concept that link profit to wages.
A - this supports both 1 and 2. IMO : A

How do you think D supports the link btn profits and wages? Profits increased but wages dropped. In my view, D supports the 2nd thought of First assumption (ie point mentioned in RED above)

A - how do you think it support point 2 (workers demand for higher wages depends on livable income rather than profits of the firm). Option says' workers likely to strike with declining profits and higher profits - note passage says 'depends on livable income while option says likely to strike with declining profits that means wages are linked with profits (up/down does not matter).

Pls share your thoughts.
D - In industry X, management cut wages by 20% even after profits increased by the same amount.

profit = 200
Wages = 100

20% cut on wages :

Wages = 80 ( -20% of wages)
profit = 220 (+20% of wages)

This establishes a link between wages and profits. The author speaks about negating the link between wages and profit ( the link can be either directly proportional or inversely proportional ).

A - According to a recent study, workers are more likely to strike in demand for higher wages in economies with declining profit rates and higher prices.

Higher prices --- higher livable income ,

Worker struggle for higher wages even if the profit of the company is declining in an economy with higher livable income. - This is exactly what the author is mentioning :

wages --- profit "workers often base their demands for higher wages on their idea of a livable income rather than the profits of the firm"
higher wages with higher profits -- "struggles between management and workers and does not come about as the result of the management's rational consideration"


Hope this helps !!