GMAT Prep

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
Thanked: 72 times
Followed by:6 members

by manpsingh87 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:38 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote:Image
1/p>r/r^2+2;

1) p=r;
we have 1/r> r/r^2+2;

now consider r=-3 we have; 1/r =-1/3

and r/r^2+2=-3/11; now -1/3<-3/11; i.e. inequality 1/p>r/r^2+2 doesn't hold true;

now consider r=3; we have; 1/r= 1/3;
and r/r^2+2=3/11, now 1/3>3/11; i.e. inequality 1/p>r/r^2+2 holds true;

hence 1 alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

2)
r>0; insufficient as we don't know the relationship between r and p;

combining yes we will consider only positive cases for which answer will always be yes as shown above.

hence C
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:12 am
Location: Dominican Republic
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:480

by MAAJ » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:09 am
1/p > r/(r²+2) ?

1) p = r
1/r > r/(r²+2) ?
mutiply by (r²+2) [won't change sign because r² + 2 will always yield + value]
(r²+2)/r > r ?
(r²+2)/r - r > 0 ?
(r²+2-r²)/r > 0 ?
2/r > 0 ? -> Insufficient

2) r > 0
Don't know anything about p and 1/p could be any negative or positive number.

3) Combined:
2/+positive > 0 ? YES!!! Will yield a positive number greater than 0.
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Sun May 01, 2011 5:51 am
Thanks all.:)
Regards,

Pranay